Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Open access
·2013

Abstract

Welcome to EMNLP 2010, Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! The conference is organized by SIGDAT, the Association for Computational Linguistics' special interest group on linguistic data and corpus-based approaches to NLP, and is held this year as a stand-alone conference at the MIT Stata Center, Massachusetts, USA on October 9-11. EMNLP 2010 received 500 submissions, a new record for the conference. The program committee was able to accept 125 papers in total (an acceptance rate of 25%). Among them, 70 of the papers (14%) were accepted for oral presentations, and 55 (11%) for poster presentations. The PC, which consists of 18 area chairs and 460 PC members from Asia, Europe, and North America, worked together to create a strong program with high quality oral and poster presentations and enlightening invited talks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/d13-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,265

Metadata

Published
2013
OpenAlex
W1516184288
Cited by
1,265
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18653/v1/d13-1
The paper
Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. (2013). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d13-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.