The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks
Open accessAbstract
John Hewitt, Percy Liang. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Our CCC designs are heuristic: as with control tasks in the probing literature (Hewitt and Liang, 2019), we rely on intuition to craft a g w that is “simpler” than f w .”
From Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as Hewitt and Liang, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization
Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03530 · Cited by 2,838
Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Parses
de Marneffe, M.-C., MacCartney, B., & Manning, C. D. (2006) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/3wtkaidk6ea8 · Cited by 2,289
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- John Hewitt and Christopher D. Manning. 2019. A structural probe for finding syntax in word represen- tations. In North American Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- guage Technologies (NAACL). Association for Com- putational Linguistics.
- Dieuwke Hupkes, Sara Veldhoen, and Willem Zuidema. 2018. Visualisation and 'diagnostic classifiers' re- veal how recurrent and recursive neural networks process hierarchical structure. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 61:907-926.
- Arne Köhn. 2015. Whatâ Ȃ Źs in an embedding? ana- lyzing word embeddings through multilingual eval- uation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2067-2073.
- Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Cor- rado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representa- tions of words and phrases and their composition- ality. In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, pages 3111-3119.
- Matthew Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018a. Deep contextualized word rep- resentations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), volume 1, pages 2227-2237.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 394
Low-Complexity Probing via Finding Subnetworks
Cao, S., Sanh, V., & Rush, A. M. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.74 · Cited by 51
Choose Your Lenses: Flaws in Gender Bias Evaluation
Orgad, H., & Belinkov, Y. (2022) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gebnlp-1.17 · Cited by 24
The Low-Dimensional Linear Geometry of Contextualized Word Representations
Hernandez, E. J., & Andreas, J. (2021) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.7 · Cited by 32
A disentangled linguistic graph model for explainable aspect-based sentiment analysis
Mei, X., Zhou, Y., Zhu, C., Wu, M., Li, M., & Pan, S. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110150 · Cited by 19
Mosbach, M., Khokhlova, A., Hedderich, M. A., & Klakow, D. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.7 · Cited by 21
Generalising to German Plural Noun Classes, from the Perspective of a Recurrent Neural Network
Dankers, V., Langedijk, A., McCurdy, K., Williams, A., & Hupkes, D. (2021) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.8 · Cited by 18
Probing for Predicate Argument Structures in Pretrained Language Models
Conia, S., & Roberto Navigli, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.316 · Cited by 20
Evaluating Document Coherence Modeling
Shen, A., Mistica, M., Salehi, B., Li, H., Baldwin, T., & Qi, J. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00388 · Cited by 22
Probing for Constituency Structure in Neural Language Models
Arps, D., Samih, Y., Kallmeyer, L., & Sajjad, H. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.502 · Cited by 28
Do PLMs Know and Understand Ontological Knowledge?
Wu, W., Jiang, C., Jiang, Y., Xie, P., & Tu, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.173 · Cited by 24
Probing Contextual Language Models for Common Ground with Visual Representations
Ilharco, G., Zellers, R., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.422 · Cited by 30
A Linguistic Study on Relevance Modeling in Information Retrieval
Fan, Y., Guo, J., Ma, X., Zhang, R., Lan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450009 · Cited by 21
Chess as a Testbed for Language Model State Tracking
Toshniwal, S., Wiseman, S., Livescu, K., & Gimpel, K. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21390 · Cited by 42
On the Pitfalls of Analyzing Individual Neurons in Language ModelsPreprint
Antverg, O., & Belinkov, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07483 · Cited by 40
What if This Modified That? Syntactic Interventions with Counterfactual Embeddings
Tucker, M., Qian, P., & Levy, R. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.76 · Cited by 16
What do tokens know about their characters and how do they know it?
Kaushal, A., & Mahowald, K. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.179 · Cited by 16
Misra, K., Rayz, J. T., & Ettinger, A. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.213 · Cited by 32
Mosbach, M., Khokhlova, A., Hedderich, M. A., & Klakow, D. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.227 · Cited by 20
When Do You Need Billions of Words of Pretraining Data?Preprint
Zhang, Y., Warstadt, A., Li, H.-S., & Bowman, S. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.04946 · Cited by 16
Let's Play Mono-Poly: BERT Can Reveal Words' Polysemy Level and Partitionability into SensesPreprint
Soler, A. G., & Apidianaki, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.14694 · Cited by 16
A Bayesian Framework for Information-Theoretic Probing
Pimentel, T., & Cotterell, R. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.229 · Cited by 16
How Gender Debiasing Affects Internal Model Representations, and Why It Matters
Orgad, H., Goldfarb-Tarrant, S., & Belinkov, Y. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.188 · Cited by 27
Can Vision-Language Models be a Good Guesser? Exploring VLMs for Times and Location Reasoning
Zhang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhang, K., & Volker Tresp, C. (2024) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00069 · Cited by 17
Exploring the Role of BERT Token Representations to Explain Sentence Probing Results
Mohebbi, H., Modarressi, A., & Pilehvar, M. T. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.61 · Cited by 28
How Reliable are Model Diagnostics?
Aribandi, V., Tay, Y., & Metzler, D. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.155 · Cited by 15
White, J. C., Pimentel, T., Saphra, N., & Cotterell, R. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.12 · Cited by 17
Chowdhury, S. A., Durrani, N., & Ali, A. M. A. (2023) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2023.101539 · Cited by 16
Gupta, V., Bhat, R. A., Ghosal, A., Shrivastava, M., Singh, M., & Srikumar, V. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00482 · Cited by 16
Do Language Models Know the Way to Rome?
Liétard, B., Abdou, M., & Søgaard, A. (2021) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.40 · Cited by 23
Analyzing BERT’s Knowledge of Hypernymy via Prompting
Hanna, M., & Mareček, D. (2021) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.20 · Cited by 18
Evaluating the construct validity of text embeddings with application to survey questions
Fang, Q., Nguyen, D., & Oberski, D. L. (2022) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00353-7 · Cited by 19
Alajrami, A., & Αλέτρας, Ν. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.16 · Cited by 23
Slobodkin, A., Goldman, O., Caciularu, A., Dagan, I., & Ravfogel, S. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.220 · Cited by 47
An information theoretic view on selecting linguistic probes
Zhu, Z., & Rudzicz, F. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.744 · Cited by 20
Linguistic Dependencies and Statistical Dependence
Hoover, J. L., Du, W., Sordoni, A., & O’Donnell, T. J. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.234 · Cited by 15
Debiasing Methods in Natural Language Understanding Make Bias More Accessible
Mendelson, M., & Belinkov, Y. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.116 · Cited by 16
Schrödinger's tree—On syntax and neural language models
Kulmizev, A., & Nivre, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.796788 · Cited by 20
Connecting Attributions and QA Model Behavior on Realistic Counterfactuals
Ye, X., Nair, R., & Durrett, G. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.447 · Cited by 15
Global Explainability of BERT-Based Evaluation Metrics by Disentangling along Linguistic Factors
Kaster, M., Zhao, W., & Eger, S. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.701 · Cited by 23
Morphosyntactic probing of multilingual BERT models
Ács, J., Hamerlik, E., Schwartz, R., Smith, N. A., & Kornai, A. (2023) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324923000190 · Cited by 25
Quantifying the Contextualization of Word Representations with Semantic Class Probing
Zhao, M., Dufter, P., Yaghoobzadeh, Y., & Schütze, H. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.109 · Cited by 14
Heads-up! Unsupervised Constituency Parsing via Self-Attention Heads
Li, B., Kim, T., Amplayo, R. K., & Keller, F. (2020) · Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (AACL-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.aacl-main.43 · Cited by 14
Probing BERT for Ranking Abilities
Wallat, J., Beringer, F., Anand, A., & Anand, A. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28238-6_17 · Cited by 17
Do Language Models Have Beliefs? Methods for Detecting, Updating, and Visualizing Model BeliefsPreprint
Hase, P., Diab, M., Çelikyılmaz, A., Li, X., Kozareva, Z., Stoyanov, V., Bansal, M., & Iyer, S. V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13654 · Cited by 31
Probing as Quantifying Inductive Bias
Immer, A., Hennigen, L. T., Fortuin, V., & Cotterell, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.129 · Cited by 14
Soler, A. G., & Apidianaki, M. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.598 · Cited by 14
BLIND: Bias Removal With No Demographics
Orgad, H., & Belinkov, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.490 · Cited by 24
A multi-facet analysis of BERT-based entity matching models
Paganelli, M., Tiano, D., & Guerra, F. (2023) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-023-00824-x · Cited by 15
Context Analysis for Pre-trained Masked Language Models
Lai, Y.-A., Lalwani, G., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.338 · Cited by 11
Testing for Grammatical Category Abstraction in Neural Language Models
Kim, N., & Smolensky, P. (2021) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/2nb8-ag59 · Cited by 11
Does BERT Understand Idioms? A Probing-Based Empirical Study of BERT Encodings of Idioms
Tan, M., & Jiang, J. (2021) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_156 · Cited by 11
Li, B., Wisniewski, G., & Crabbé, B. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00531 · Cited by 12
Eger, S., Daxenberger, J., & Gurevych, I. (2020) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.conll-1.8 · Cited by 12
Visually Analyzing Contextualized Embeddings
Berger, M. (2020) · Visualization · doi:10.1109/vis47514.2020.00062 · Cited by 13
Introducing Orthogonal Constraint in Structural Probes
Limisiewicz, T., & Mareček, D. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.36 · Cited by 17
Alleman, M., Mamou, J., Rio, M. A. D., Tang, H., Kim, Y., & Chung, S. (2021) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.repl4nlp-1.27 · Cited by 17
Evaluating representations by the complexity of learning low-loss predictorsPreprint
Whitney, W. F., Song, M. J., Brandfonbrener, D., Altosaar, J., & Cho, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.07368 · Cited by 20
Does syntax matter? A strong baseline for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis with RoBERTaPreprint
Dai, J., Yan, H. R., Sun, T., Liu, P., & Qiu, X. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.04986 · Cited by 11
METAGENE-1: Metagenomic Foundation Model for Pandemic MonitoringPreprint
Liu, O., Jaghour, S., Hagemann, J., Wang, S., Wiemels, J., Kaufman, J. T., & Neiswanger, W. (2025) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/fmepo7 · Cited by 17
Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretability
Geiger, A., Ibeling, D., Zur, A., Chaudhary, M., Chauhan, S., Huang, J., Arora, A., Wu, Z., Goodman, N., Potts, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04709 · Cited by 11
Investigate the rainfall-runoff relationship and hydrological concepts inside LSTM
Hu, Y., Li, H., Zhang, C., Wang, T., Chu, W. P., & Li, R. (2025) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106527 · Cited by 12
Fayyaz, M., Aghazadeh, E., Modarressi, A., Mohebbi, H., & Pilehvar, M. T. (2021) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.29 · Cited by 16
Explainable Natural Language Processing
Søgaard, A. (2021) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s01118ed1v01y202107hlt051 · Cited by 32
Neural classification maps for distinct word combinations in Broca’s area
Schell, M., Friederici, A. D., & Zaccarella, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.930849 · Cited by 11
Xu, N., Gui, T., Ma, R., Zhang, Q., Ye, J., Zhang, M., & Huang, X. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.552 · Cited by 14
Finding structure during incremental speech comprehension
Lyu, B., Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., Fang, Y., & TYLER, L. K. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.89311 · Cited by 12
FMMformer: Efficient and Flexible Transformer via Decomposed Near-field and Far-field AttentionPreprint
Nguyen, T. M., Suliafu, V., Osher, S., Chen, L., & Bao, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.02347 · Cited by 12
Movva, R., & Zhao, J. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.19 · Cited by 9
SLING: Sino Linguistic Evaluation of Large Language Models
Song, Y., Krishna, K., Bhatt, R., & Iyyer, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.305 · Cited by 13
Ouyang, W., Gu, X., Ye, L., Liu, X., & Zhang, C. (2025) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2023wr036593 · Cited by 12
Classifier Probes May Just Learn from Linear Context Features
Kunz, J., & Kuhlmann, M. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.450 · Cited by 14
What’s in Your Head? Emergent Behaviour in Multi-Task Transformer Models
Geva, M., Katz, U., Ben-Arie, A., & Berant, J. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.646 · Cited by 9
INSPECT: Intrinsic and Systematic Probing Evaluation for Code Transformers
Karmakar, A., & Robbes, R. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3341624 · Cited by 9
Probing Linguistic Information for Logical Inference in Pre-trained Language Models
Chen, Z., & Gao, Q. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21294 · Cited by 11
Rationalizing predictions by adversarial information calibration
Sha, L., Camburu, O.-M., & Lukasiewicz, T. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2022.103828 · Cited by 11
Probing Text Models for Common Ground with Visual RepresentationsPreprint
Ilharco, G., Zellers, R., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 10
Unsupervised Distillation of Syntactic Information from Contextualized Word Representations
Ravfogel, S., Elazar, Y., Goldberger, J., & Goldberg, Y. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.9 · Cited by 12
Finding Structural Knowledge in Multimodal-BERT
Milewski, V., de Lhoneux, M., & Moens, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.388 · Cited by 8
Adversarial Scrubbing of Demographic Information for Text Classification
Chowdhury, S. B. R., Ghosh, S., Li, Y., Oliva, J. B., Srivastava, S., & Chaturvedi, S. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.43 · Cited by 13
Linguistic Frameworks Go Toe-to-Toe at Neuro-Symbolic Language Modeling
Prange, J., Schneider, N., & Kong, L. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.325 · Cited by 9
DeepLens: Interactive Out-of-distribution Data Detection in NLP Models
Song, D., Wang, Z., Huang, Y., Ma, L., & Zhang, T. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580741 · Cited by 9
Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning
Wu, Z., Merrill, W., Peng, H. M., Beltagy, I., & Smith, N. A. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00565 · Cited by 8
Examining the rhetorical capacities of neural language models
Zhu, Z., Pan, C., Abdalla, M., & Rudzicz, F. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.3 · Cited by 12
Meta-tuning Language Models to Answer Prompts Better.Preprint
Zhong, R., Lee, K., Zhang, Z., & Klein, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 8
diagNNose: A Library for Neural Activation Analysis
Jumelet, J. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.32 · Cited by 6
Shaking Syntactic Trees on the Sesame Street: Multilingual Probing with Controllable Perturbations
Taktasheva, E., Mikhailov, V., & Artemova, E. (2021) · Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning (MRL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.mrl-1.17 · Cited by 8
To be or not to be an Integer? Encoding Variables for Mathematical Text
Ferreira, D. M., Thayaparan, M., Valentino, M., Rozanova, J., & Freitas, A. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.76 · Cited by 7
Emergent Structures and Training Dynamics in Large Language Models
Teehan, R., Clinciu, M., Serikov, O., Szczechla, E., Seelam, N., Mirkin, S., & Gokaslan, A. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bigscience-1.11 · Cited by 9
A multilabel approach to morphosyntactic probing
Shapiro, N. T., Paullada, A., & Steinert‐Threlkeld, S. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.382 · Cited by 10
Joint Universal Syntactic and Semantic Parsing
Stengel-Eskin, E., Murray, K., Zhang, S., White, A. S., & Durme, B. V. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00396 · Cited by 7
Probing Word Translations in the Transformer and Trading Decoder for Encoder Layers
Xu, H., van Genabith, J., Liu, Q., & Xiong, D. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.7 · Cited by 13
Bird’s Eye: Probing for Linguistic Graph Structures with a Simple Information-Theoretic Approach
Hou, Y., & Sachan, M. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.145 · Cited by 8
LMTurk: Few-Shot Learners as Crowdsourcing Workers in a Language-Model-as-a-Service Framework
Zhao, M., Mi, F., Wang, Y., Li, M., Jiang, X., Liu, Q., & Schuetze, H. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.51 · Cited by 12
Probing artificial neural networks: insights from neurosciencePreprint
Ivanova, A. A., Hewitt, J., & Zaslavsky, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08197 · Cited by 17
Self-citationOn the influence of discourse connectives on the predictions of humans and language models
Britton, J., Cong, Y., Hsu, Y.-Y., Chersoni, E., & Blache, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1363120 · Cited by 6
On convex decision regions in deep network representations
Tětková, L., Brüsch, T., Dorszewski, T., Mager, F. M., Aagaard, R. Ø., Foldager, J., Alstrøm, T. S., & Hansen, L. K. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60809-y · Cited by 10
Probing for Incremental Parse States in Autoregressive Language Models
Eisape, T., Gangireddy, V., Lévy, R., & Kim, Y. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.203 · Cited by 11
Kunz, J. (2024) · Linköping studies in science and technology. Dissertations · doi:10.3384/9789180754712 · Cited by 7
Liu, L., Qin, T., Zhou, Y., Wang, C., & Guan, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2024.3397961 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Hewitt, J., & Liang, P.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liang, Percy
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 2733-2743
- OpenAlex
- W2970862333
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 76
- FWCI
- 26.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- probing, control tasks, neural network interpretability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review