The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection
Open accessAbstract
We investigate how annotators' insensitivity to differences in dialect can lead to racial bias in automatic hate speech detection models, potentially amplifying harm against minority populations.We first uncover unexpected correlations between surface markers of African American English (AAE) and ratings of toxicity in several widely-used hate speech datasets.Then, we show that models trained on these corpora acquire and propagate these biases, such that AAE tweets and tweets by self-identified African Americans are up to two times more likely to be labelled as offensive compared to others.Finally, we propose dialect and race priming as ways to reduce the racial bias in annotation, showing that when annotators are made explicitly aware of an AAE tweet's dialect they are significantly less likely to label the tweet as offensive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Toxicity detection models misclassify African-American English tweets as negative more often than those written in Standard American English (Mozafari, Farahbakhsh, and Crespi 2020; Sap et al. 2019).”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Sap et al. 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, toxicity classifiers may disproportionately flag African-American English (Mozafari, Farahbakhsh, and Crespi 2020; Sap et al. 2019)”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Sap et al. 2019
In the citing paper
“models are trained with historical data and can present issues such as gender bias and racial bias in AI models [68,73], potentially exacerbating structural inequalities [10]”
From Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderation (2022) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Hierarchical Attention Networks for Document Classification
Yang, Z., Yang, D., Dyer, C., He, X., Smola, A. J., & Hovy, E. H. (2016) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1174 · Cited by 5,022
Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language
Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M., & Weber, I. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955 · Cited by 2,610
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Attention-based LSTM for Aspect-level Sentiment Classification
Wang, Y., Huang, M., zhu, X., & Zhao, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1058 · Cited by 2,450
The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families
O'Keeffe, G. S., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0054 · Cited by 1,987 · cited 1×
“Toxic language (e.g., hate speech, abusive speech, or other offensive speech) primarily targets members of minority groups and can catalyze real-life violence towards them (O’Keeffe et al., 2011; Cleland, 2014; Mozur, 2018).”
BackgroundHateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter
Talat, Z., & Hovy, D. (2016) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-2013 · Cited by 1,919
Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice.
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811 · Cited by 1,689
A Survey on Hate Speech Detection using Natural Language Processing
Schmidt, A., & Wiegand, M. (2017) · SocialNLP@EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-1101 · Cited by 1,478
Detecting Hate Speech on Twitter Using a Convolution-GRU Based Deep Neural Network
Zhang, Z., Robinson, D., & Tepper, J. A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_48 · Cited by 676
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- E. Ashby Plant and Patricia G. Devine. 1998. Inter- nal and external motivation to respond without prej- udice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 75(3):811-832.
- Zichao Yang, Diyi Yang, Chris Dyer, Xiaodong He, Alexander J. Smola, and Eduard H. Hovy. 2016. Hi- erarchical attention networks for document classifi- cation. In NAACL.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 808
Frost‐Arnold, K. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190089184.003.0004
The model thinks what?! Interpreting deep NLP models with rationales and influence
Jain, S. (2022) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20467212
Individuals, Society, and AI: Online Communication
Boddington, P. (2023) · Artificial intelligence: foundations, theory, and algorithms/Artificial intelligence: Foundations, theory, and algorithms · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-9382-4_9
Designing Closed-Loop Models for Task Allocation
Keswani, V., Celis, L. E., Kenthapadi, K., & Lease, M. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230072
Gender Bias Propagation on Hate Speech: An Analysis at Feature-LevelPreprint
Nascimento, F. R. S., Cavalcanti, G. D. C., & Costa‐Abreu, M. D. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4517546
Relationality and Offensive Speech: A Research Agenda
Amironesei, R., & Díaz, M. (2023) · WOAH · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.woah-1.8 · Cited by 1
CFL: Causally Fair Language Models Through Token-level Attribute Controlled Generation
Madhavan, R., Garg, R., Wadhawan, K., & Mehta, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.720 · Cited by 4
DS at SemEval-2023 Task 10: Explaining Online Sexism using Transformer based Approach
Padmavathi, M. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.152
NaturalAdversaries: Can Naturalistic Adversaries Be as Effective as Artificial Adversaries?
Gabriel, S., Palangi, H., & Choi, Y. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.413
Self-citationLEXPLAIN: Improving Model Explanations via Lexicon Supervision
Ahia, O., Gonen, H., Balachandran, V., Tsvetkov, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2023) · STARSEM · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.starsem-1.19
Self-citationالتغطية الإعلامية الرقمية العربية والأوروبية لبعضها البعض: تحليل وسائل الإعلام في عدة بلدان
الزيود, م. (2023) · المجلة العربية لبحوث الاعلام والاتصال · doi:10.21608/jkom.2023.315826
Mary.T., J. F. S. A. (2023) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr23826193154
Williams, N. W. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192868282.013.47
Saeid, Y., Wolf, V., & Neubürger, F. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7814-4_35
Annotators' Perspectives: Exploring the Influence of Identity on Interpreting Misogynoir
Kwarteng, J., Farrell, T., Third, A., & Fernández, M. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3625007.3627292 · Cited by 2
Rehman, U., Shah, M. U., Iqbal, F., & Fatima, R. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4771255
Battling cultural bias within hate speech detection: An experimental correlation analysis
Bhattacharya, S., & Kanzinger, J. (2024) · Journal of Emerging Investigators · doi:10.59720/23-156
Review of Offensive Language Detection on Social Media: Current Trends and Opportunities
Altın, L. S. M., & Saggion, H. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56728-5_6
StereoHate: Toward identifying stereotypical bias and target group in hate speech detection
Maity, K., Ghosh, N., Jain, R., Saha, S., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2024) · Natural language processing. · doi:10.1017/nlp.2024.29
Technoliberalism for the people: Popular discourses about governance on Archive of Our Own
Elsner, M. (2024) · The Journal of Fandom Studies · doi:10.1386/jfs_00088_1
Xiao, R., Zhang, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Hou, S., & Liu, L. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2396437
Cultural Violence and Peace Interventions in Social Media
Kaufhold, M., Haunschild, J., & Reuter, C. (2024) · Technology, peace and security · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-44810-3_18
Dynamics of Scope Ambiguities: Comparative Analysis of Human and GPT Model Performance in KoreanPreprint
Yoo, M. H., & Song, S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5118293
Albalawi, A. M., & Yafooz, W. M. S. (2023) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Signal and Image Processing (AIRoSIP) · doi:10.1109/airosip58759.2023.10873966
A bias evaluation solution for multiple sensitive attribute speech recognition
Chen, Z., Zhou, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, F., Leng, T., & Zhu, H. (2025) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2025.101787 · Cited by 2
Ethics in Natural Language Processing: Addressing Bias, Privacy, and Misinformation
Joshi, H. S., & Taherdoost, H. (2025) · International Conference on Pervasive Computational Technologies (ICPCT) · doi:10.1109/icpct64145.2025.10941029
BAAF: A Framework for Media Bias Detection
Sar, S., Adhikary, S., & Roy, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88714-7_24
Time to politicization: the emergence and effects of politics on science YouTube videos
Omapang, A. K. B., Green, B., Yu, C., Muenster, R. M., & Margolin, D. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2486054
Enhancing AI-Centered Social Cybersecurity Education through Learning Platform Design
Vishwamitra, N., Okpala, E., Liao, S., Guo, K., Shah, S., Hu, H., Yuan, X., & Cheng, L. (2025) · Journal of The Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education · doi:10.53735/cisse.v12i1.204
Bose, S., & Su, G. (2024) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat62293.2024.00054
Dover, Y., & Oreg, S. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2026.109030 · Cited by 1
Analyzing Offensive Content and Emotional Dynamics in Black Lives Matter Discourse on Twitter
Okpala, E., Cheng, L., & Elelu, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35878
Implications From the Analogous Relationship Between Evolutionary and Learning Processes
Leong, J. C. K., Imaizumi, M., Innan, H., & Irie, N. (2025) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.70027
AI Surrogacy in Psychological ResearchPreprint
D’Alessandro, W., & Thompson, J. A. F. (2025) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6emg9_v1
Ogbuokiri, B., Obaido, G., Kamalu, C., Aruleba, K., Achilonu, O., Mienye, I. D., Echezona, S. C., Ujah-Ogbuagu, B. C., & Seyyed-Kalantari, L. (2025) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2025.100717 · Cited by 2
Socially Responsible and Explainable Automated Fact-Checking and Hate Speech Detection
Vargas, F., Pardo, T. A. S., & Benevenuto, F. (2025) · doi:10.5753/ctd.2025.8511
How Not to Make Predictive AI Trustworthy
Zhang, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7185-4_4
Improving Hindi Hate Speech Detection: Optimized LSTM with Sparrow Search and G-BERT Model
Chauhan, S., Deepanshi, & Srivastava, J. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7137-3_9
Subburaj, A., Kathiresan, A., Ponnusamy, R., Buitelaar, P., & Chakravarthi, B. R. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05855-3_27
Exploring Hate Speech Classification in Low-Resource Languages
Yadav, S., Kaushik, A., & McDaid, K. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3063-1.ch008
Kim, R. S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5717409
Zhang, B., Lu, J., Liang, Y., Xu, B., & Lin, H. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3349-7_39
Bias Beyond English: Evaluating Social Bias and Debiasing Methods in a Low-Resource Setting
Zhou, E., & Lü, W. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3349-7_17
Detecting Bias in Social Media Using SentiWordNet
Rao, P. G., Chigurupati, H., Hashia, K., Thriveni, J., Shenoy, P. D., & Venugopal, K. R. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5860-2_12
Training LLM with Human Feedback
Rezaei, H., Beheshti, A., & Rabhi, F. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3658-0_53
Log in, lie down: ethics and the digital turn in psychotherapy
Branford, J., & Conrad, J. A. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2599894
Large language models and critical thinking: bias, social impact, and political implications
Poibeau, T. (2025) · Ubiquity Press eBooks · doi:10.5334/bde.h
Embracing Training Dataset Bias for Automated Harmful Detection
Schöpke-Gonzalez, A., Kim, N., & Hemphill, L. (2025) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1282
Yeaton, M., Anshuman, S., & Srivastava, S. B. (2026) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/740301
Developer Prompts in Practice: An Empirical Study of Bias, Security, and Optimization
Rzig, D. E., Paul, D. J., Pister, K. S., Henkel, J. M., & Hassan, F. (2025) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem64174.2025.00067
Toxic Language and Threat Detection in Social Media
Tofighi, N. J., Kaveh, H., Sailunaz, K., Elsheikh, A. M. A., Elgammal, Z., AbuShaar, S., Özdemir, M. K., Rokne, J. G., & Alhajj, R. (2025) · International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI) · doi:10.1109/icsai68704.2025.11345876
Forecasting “Neg Storms”: Time-Aware Modeling of Toxic Situations in Social Media
Akter, I., Singh, V. K., & Atrey, P. K. (2025) · International Symposium on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/ism66958.2025.00063
Ethical Research on Fairness and Privacy in Kazakh Toxicity Detection
Zulkhazhav, A., Altaibek, M., Omarbekova, A., Beibarys, S., & Begenov, O. (2025) · International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (ICIME) · doi:10.1109/icime66598.2025.00010
AI-Based Approaches for Cyberbullying and Toxic Comment Detection
Zaheer, I., Singh, A., & Singh, P. D. V. (2025) · ANALISTA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.71182/aijmr.2512.0302.5005
AI, Social Media, and the Marginalization of Indian Muslims
Fahad, A., & Abad, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198945253.003.0125
PRISM: Principled Reasoning for Identifying and Suppressing Model Biases at Scale
Zhu, X., Li, W., & Lin, J. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7081-2_3
FABLE: Fairness Attack in Abusive Language Detection
Liang, Y., Cheng, L., Payani, A., & Shu, K. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11401648
Sosyal Hizmette Sosyal Fayda Odaklı Yapay Zekâ
Yurttabir, H. H. (2026) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub1227.c4928
da Silva, G. C. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/067705c4z4710z45b7za2c2z2c82fd9a0b13 · Cited by 2
Automatic Hate Speech Detection on Social Media
Chiril, P. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/3d8fbeb4z4be4z46b5z8044zff3688df0033
Expanding the training data for neural network based hate speech classification
d'Sa, A. G. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e5736942z9e13z4754z926fzad5d682c3a40
Black drama: between hate speech and algorithmic racism
Rosa, C. C. S., Ishii, R. P., & Martinez, F. V. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla66185.2025.00219
Transfer learning for abusive language detection
Bose, T. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/6b663c61zb592z4422zbc5fza68cbc285104
Loke, R. E., & Özay, B. (2026) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16288-5_39
Thinnakkakath, G. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6566-4.ch001
Enhancing linguistic research through critical use of race and ethnicity information
Squizzero, R., Horst, M., Wassink, A. B., Panicacci, A., Moroz, A., Conrod, K., & Bender, E. M. (2026) · Language · doi:10.1017/s0097850726000093
Kalinec-Craig, C. A., Tekin, Ş., Yuen, T. T., & Rios, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12174-5_7
Navigating the Shifts in AI-Augmented Classrooms
Sarkar, R., & Chakrabarty, N. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6063-8.ch007
Artificial Intelligence in Studying Russian and Chinese Space Terms
Goncharova, O. V., Митрофанова, И. Ю., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Ethical economy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23423-0_23 · Cited by 1
Gangrade, M., & Sivasamy, S. (2026) · International Conference on Smart Multidomain Integrated Learning Environments (ICSMILE) · doi:10.1109/icsmile69273.2026.11519239
AraToxi-Agent: A Multi-LLM Consensus System for Arabic Toxicity Detection and Sanitization
Lulu, I. R., Alhammadi, F. A., & Elnagar, A. (2026) · International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Engineering Systems (ICETES) · doi:10.1109/icetes68504.2026.11518772
TOXICHECK: A Unified Framework for Bias and Toxicity Evaluation in Large Language Models
Nandhakumar, C., & Vaishali, R. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications Theme: Healthcare and Internet of Things (AIMLA) · doi:10.1109/aimla67915.2026.11522381
DetBias: A Framework for Detecting Bias in NLP Classifier Models
Adil, M. F., Aswani, S., & Shetty, S. D. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25617-1_32
Rodrigo-Ginés, F.-J., Chamorro-Padial, J., & Rodríguez-Díaz, P. (2026) · Conference on Algebraic Informatics · doi:10.1109/cai68641.2026.11536395
Multi-dimensional bias and fairness assessment framework for hate speech detection models
Shukla, S., Nagpal, S., & Sabharwal, S. (2026) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0327167
Sentiment analysis of sports fans’ behaviour: A multimodal review of digital and in-venue fan affect
Ziaee, A., & Ziabari, S. S. M. (2026) · Journal of Sports Analytics · doi:10.1177/22150218261455495
Applications of Generative AI for Tackling Cyberbullying
Ramachandran, M. (2026) · Texts in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25874-8_13
The Human Factor in Data Cleaning: Exploring Preferences and Biases
AbdElazim, H., Islam, S., & Milani, M. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) · doi:10.1109/icdew71238.2026.00014
Sharma, R. R., Kaur, A., Gupta, S., Gulkotwar, N., & Bhatia, K. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01198-w
Wasi, A. T., Heidari, O. R., Anam, M. U., Rahman, A., Agarwal, A., Patel, H. L., Kumar, B., Rafi, T. H., & Chae, D. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-1947-6_48
Bureaucratic Silences: What the Canadian AI Register Reveals, Omits, and Obscures
Das, D., Tessono, C., Ahmed, S. I., & Guha, S. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812336 · Cited by 2
ScrapLLM: Benchmarking Data Acquisition for Research in Hate Speech Detection
Shah, R., Sheth, D., Shah, S., Shah, P., & Lohiya, R. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics, Cognition and Machine Learning Applications (ICCCMLA) · doi:10.1109/icccmla66092.2025.11580539
Mohammed Abul Hassan, A., Ashwath Kumar, A., Jeya Surya, J., Indirajeet Narayan, B., & Shenbagharaman, A. (2026) · International Conference on Innovations in Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Development (ICIETSD) · doi:10.1109/icietsd68684.2026.11584675
Leveraging Large Language Models and Social Media Scraping for Online Insurgent Narrative Detection
Mythili, R., Singh, A., S, K. R. M., S, S. S. M., K, R. B., Balaji, C., & Mithileysh Sathyanarayanan, S. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.06.490
Κουτσουπιάς, Ν., & Nosios, M. (2026) · Peace Studies · doi:10.3390/peacestud1030008
A Mandate Beyond Accuracy: Forging the Algorithm’s Social Contract
Singh, N., & Foulds, J. R. (2026) · Artificial intelligence · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1015619
Requirements Modelling for Hate Speech Detection and Analysis
Almpani, S., Kavakli, E., Loucopoulos, P., & Valari, E. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32032-2_1
Dialect Bias in Arabic Toxicity Detection Under Controlled Distributional Shifts
Alamri, M. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15163612
Agrawal, A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4642-7.ch005
Named Entity Masking for De-biasing Text Classification: Experiments with German Datasets
Kiok, D., Pitroda, K., Knierim, A., & Mandl, T. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39150-6_6
An Explainable and Counterfactual Framework for Manipulative Language Analysis in Conversational AI
Hasan, M. R. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39708-9_10
Gallardo, A., Klucinec, L., Bauer, L., & Cranor, L. F. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3817022
Language as data, hate as task: The epistemic normalisation of hate speech in AI
Ullmann, S. (2026) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/14614456261487861
Fine-tuning large language models for binary and multiclass target-specific hate speech detection
Kaddoura, S., & Al‐Kohlani, S. A. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02354-1
Towards an Accountability-by-Design Framework for LLM Moderation in Minority Ethnic Communities
Micallef, N., & Wu, Y. D. (2026) · International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (GoodIT) · doi:10.1145/3794786.3830739
Digitocracy: Why is AI Insidious for Democracy?
Simon, W. R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22853-6_12
Context Matters, Bias Matters Too: Assessing Fairness in Profile Embeddings in the HateBR Dataset
Moitinho, V. (2026) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Bancos de Dados (SBBD) · doi:10.5753/sbbd.2026.249257
Metadata
- Authors
- Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sap, Maarten
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 1668-1678
- ISSN
- 0736-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2949678053
- Cited by
- 817
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 40.99
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1714566)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- hate speech detection, racial bias, African American English, dialects, annotation bias, hate speech datasets, priming, minority groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
