Cited by 102Mental Health via WritingSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Suicide Risk Assessment with Multi-level Dual-Context Language and

Matero, Matthew, Idnani, Akash, Son, Youngseo, Giorgi, Sal, Vu, Huy, Zamani, Mohammad, Limbachiya, Parth, Guntuku, Sharath Chandra +1 more·2019·Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Mental health predictive systems typically model language as if from a single context (e.g. Twitter posts, status updates, or forum posts) and often limited to a single level of analysis (e.g. either the message-level or user-level). Here, we bring these pieces together to explore the use of open-vocabulary (BERT embeddings, topics) and theoretical features (emotional expression lexica, personality) for the task of suicide risk assessment on support forums (the CLPsych-2019 Shared Task). We used dual context based approaches (modeling content from suicide forums separate from other content), built over both traditional ML models as well as a novel dual RNN architecture with user-factor adaptation. We find that while affect from the suicide context distinguishes with no-risk from those with “any-risk”, personality factors from the non-suicide contexts provide distinction of the levels of risk: low, medium, and high risk. Within the shared task, our dual-context approach (listed as SBU-HLAB in the official results) achieved state-of-the-art performance predicting suicide risk using a combination of suicide-context and non-suicide posts (Task B), achieving an F1 score of 0.50 over hidden test set labels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/w19-3005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 102

Authors
Matero, M., Idnani, A., Son, Y., Giorgi, S., Vu, H., Zamani, M., Limbachiya, P., Guntuku, S. C., & Schwartz, H. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology
Published
2019
Pages
39-44
OpenAlex
W2963777125
Cited by
102
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
20.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
suicide risk assessment, BERT embeddings, topic modeling, personality traits, mental health prediction, online text analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review