The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizing the Work of the Research Library
Open accessAbstract
Ithaka S+R is a strategic consulting and research service provided by ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, hierarchies in academic libraries do not appear to be flattening substantially.”
From “Viewed as Equals”: The Impacts of Library Organizational Cultures and Management on Library Staff Morale (2022) · cites this paper as Schonfeld, 2016
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Positioning the Academic Library within the Institution: A Literature Review
Cox, J. (2018) · New Review of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1080/13614533.2018.1466342 · Cited by 77
Glusker, A., Emmelhainz, C., Estrada, N., & Dyess, B. (2022) · Journal of Library Administration · doi:10.1080/01930826.2022.2026119 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Schonfeld, R.
- Corresponding author
- Schonfeld, Roger
- ORCID
- Schonfeld, Roger
- Publisher
- Ithaka S+R
- Published
- 2016-08-18
- OpenAlex
- W4241453077
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
- Keywords
- research libraries, library organization, academic libraries, scholarly communication, digital preservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
