Cited by 11Library Science and InformationWeb and Library ServicesLibrary Science and Information Literacy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

It’s Not What Libraries Hold; It’s Who Libraries Serve: Seeking a User-Centered Future for Academic Libraries

Open access

Abstract

In 2018, OhioLINK engaged its membership to envision a constellation of platforms and applications that would take the next step beyond “next-generation” commercial integrated library systems (ILS). This paper is the result of that process. The business of higher education, as it relates to libraries, is amid continued and drastic change. Managing collections is now but one aspect of library management. Libraries support teaching, affordable learning, and innovative research. They are managing services and products, online and off, amid expanding service offerings and technological advancements while under added pressure to reduce costs and barriers for people who want to learn—be it for a certificate, a two- or four-year degree, or a Ph.D. The responsibilities of academic libraries have evolved, yet Integrated Library Systems (ILS) still narrowly focus on the acquisition, management, and delivery of objects while the end user remains in the background. It is OhioLINK’s belief it is imperative to shift that focus, moving from collections and holdings to those that use them. It’s not what libraries hold, but who libraries serve.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18665/sr.312608

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 The Primacy of Print is Past
Fig 1 The Primacy of Print is PastCC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. OCLC, "A Snapshot of Priorities & Perspectives: U.S. Library Consortia," Survey Report, 2013, https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/us-consortia/214986-member-communication-survey-report-consortia-review.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Evans, G., & Schonfeld, R.
Affiliations
Ithaka S+R (US)
Publisher
Ithaka S+R
Published
2020-01-23
OpenAlex
W3001279348
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
academic libraries, integrated library systems, user-centered design, library services, OhioLINK, library user experience, affordable learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review