The DOI matches its Crossref record.
It’s Not What Libraries Hold; It’s Who Libraries Serve: Seeking a User-Centered Future for Academic Libraries
Open accessAbstract
In 2018, OhioLINK engaged its membership to envision a constellation of platforms and applications that would take the next step beyond “next-generation” commercial integrated library systems (ILS). This paper is the result of that process. The business of higher education, as it relates to libraries, is amid continued and drastic change. Managing collections is now but one aspect of library management. Libraries support teaching, affordable learning, and innovative research. They are managing services and products, online and off, amid expanding service offerings and technological advancements while under added pressure to reduce costs and barriers for people who want to learn—be it for a certificate, a two- or four-year degree, or a Ph.D. The responsibilities of academic libraries have evolved, yet Integrated Library Systems (ILS) still narrowly focus on the acquisition, management, and delivery of objects while the end user remains in the background. It is OhioLINK’s belief it is imperative to shift that focus, moving from collections and holdings to those that use them. It’s not what libraries hold, but who libraries serve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This finding aligns with the argument made by Evans and Schonfeld (2020) that the library system should be viewed as an integral part of the higher education system.”
From Library Correlational Assessment and Campus Partnership for Student Success (2025) · cites this paper as Evans and Schonfeld (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- OCLC, "A Snapshot of Priorities & Perspectives: U.S. Library Consortia," Survey Report, 2013, https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/us-consortia/214986-member-communication-survey-report-consortia-review.pdf.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Library Correlational Assessment and Campus Partnership for Student Success
Yu, H., & Dobry, A. (2025) · College and Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.86.3.488 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, G., & Schonfeld, R.
- Affiliations
- Ithaka S+R (US)
- Publisher
- Ithaka S+R
- Published
- 2020-01-23
- OpenAlex
- W3001279348
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Keywords
- academic libraries, integrated library systems, user-centered design, library services, OhioLINK, library user experience, affordable learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

