The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“It Was Like We Were All Equal”: Maximizing Youth Development Using Youth-Adult Partnerships
Abstract
Quality relationships between youth and adults are critical for effective youth development programming.However, not all youth-adult relationships equally contribute to positive development.Of the differing types of relationships, youth-adult partnerships, characterized by opportunities for youth voice and supportive relationships with adults, are associated with positive youth development outcomes.Available research supports this claim finding participation in a youth-adult partnership is associated with outcomes such as greater empowerment, psychological agency, and community connectedness.However, little empirical work has qualitatively explored youths’ experience in a youth-adult partnership and its contribution to youth development outcomes.The purpose of the current study was to understand the experience of youth participating in a youth-adult partnership and how this experience was associated with positive youth development outcomes. A qualitative case study approach was used to collect interview and activity observation data from 29 youth between the ages of 14 and 18 years old who participated in a youth-adult partnership while implementing a 4-H Youth Development program.Youth were asked generally about their experience in the partnership including what worked well, what challenges they experienced, and how they overcame these challenges.From these interviews and observations, six themes emerged that captured what worked well, including mutual respect, independence or autonomy in teaching, having an adult as a supportive mentor or coach, shared responsibilities or partnerships with adults and peers, friendship with adults and peers, and having fun.Three themes appeared related to challenges including communication, logistics, and preconceived notions of working with adults.Youth responses aligned with the Essential Elements, 4-H’s conceptualization of positive youth development, indicating positive outcomes had been experienced. Youth-adult partnerships represent one approach for promoting positive youth development while engaging young people.These partnerships have the advantage of being adaptable to a variety of content areas.Findings provide insight into how parks and recreation agencies might design and organize their programs to maximize the effectiveness of youth-adult partnerships.The paper concludes by reviewing the application of youth-adult partnerships to a parks and recreation context, examples of how parks and recreation are already using youth-adult partnerships, and providing suggestions for how to implement this approach in other communities. Subscribe to JPRA
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The third component of promoting-catalyzing encourages self-esteem, autonomy and self-direction, role modeling, guidance, advocacy, empowerment and challenge, future planning, and promoting motivation. Other elements of this component include skill-based career and academic support [80,82,83,85,86,88,92,93,98,108].”
From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [82]
In the citing paper
“Three key active ingredients have been recognized: emotional, recreational, and promoting-catalyzing [82,83,84].”
From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [82]
In the citing paper
“The recreational component refers to connectedness, companionship, friendship, and ongoing communication [80,82,91,92,94,96,97,98,99,103,104], accompanied by collaboration, mutuality [39,86,94,95,96,103,105], and self-disclosure [106,107].”
From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [82]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review
Goldner, L., & Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115666 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Weybright, E. H., Trauntvein, N., & Deen, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- University of New Hampshire (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Park and Recreation Administration
- Publisher
- Sagamore Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-19
- ISSN
- 0735-1968 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-6862
- OpenAlex
- W2595936984
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Park and Recreation Administration (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Keywords
- youth-adult partnerships, positive youth development, 4-H, youth voice, adult-youth relationships, mentoring, youth empowerment, community ties, youth experiences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “It Was Like We Were All Equal”: Maximizing Youth Development Using Youth-Adult Partnerships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18666/jpra-2017-v35-i1-7246
- The paper
- Weybright, E. H., Trauntvein, N., & Deen, M. K. (2017). “It Was Like We Were All Equal”: Maximizing Youth Development Using Youth-Adult Partnerships. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. https://doi.org/10.18666/jpra-2017-v35-i1-7246