Cited by 3Information Systems Education and Curriculum DevelopmentHigher Education and EmployabilityAI and HR Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tools and Technologies Utilized in Data-Related Positions: An Empirical Study of Job Advertisements

Open access
Musazade, Nurlan·2023·36th Bled eConference – Digital Economy and Society: The Balancing Act for Digital Innovation in Times of Instability: June 25 – 28, 2023, Bled, Slovenia, Conference Proceedings

Abstract

Role, value and amount of data and related tools, technologies, companies and professions in society is rising. Since the required skills for data-related professions are predicted to experience changes, and labor market mismatches create challenges for stakeholders, this research focuses on changes in the required tools and technologies for data-related positions. The presented research defines trends and changes in frequencies of the tools utilized in the data-related professions by applying quantitative content analysis on collected data from job advertisements of Finland, Denmark and Poland. The research findings show that tools used in data-related professions experience significant changes over time. For example, AI and cloud computing-related skills, and SQL started to be required more, whereas Excel, SPSS and similar tools are less expected from the candidates. Furthermore, while R programming language utilization rises in analytics related positions, Python is more common in positions related to data science.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18690/um.fov.6.2023.10

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Marr, B. (2019). Artificial intelligence in practice: How 50 successful companies used artificial intelligence to solve problems (First Edition). Wiley.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-06-2019-0290 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Musazade, N.
Affiliations
Åbo Akademi University (FI)
Corresponding author
Musazade, Nurlan
Venue
36th Bled eConference – Digital Economy and Society: The Balancing Act for Digital Innovation in Times of Instability: June 25 – 28, 2023, Bled, Slovenia, Conference Proceedings
Published
2023-12-12
Pages
155-170
OpenAlex
W4389625879
Cited by
3
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bled eConference (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
job advertisements, skill requirements, labor market mismatch, data science, data analytics, programming languages, R programming language, Python, SQL, cloud computing, AI competencies, Microsoft Excel, SPSS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review