Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Mongol Invasion of Hungary in 1241–1242. New Perspective

Sebők, Ferenc·2024·Faces of War

Abstract

The Mongols invaded Hungary in the spring of 1241 and occupied it until the middle of 1242. Recent research has unearthed new data in connection with Hungarian resistance against the Mongols and on the basis of these new observations of historians and archaeologists we can conclude that local resistance was substantially stronger than had been concluded earlier. The Mongols faced serious difficulty in expanding their occupation in Hungary. New light has also been shed on the history of the battle of Muhi, which was the decisive turning point in the Mongolian campaign. Hungarian troops, especially warriors of the military orders (Knights Templar and Knights Hospitaller) caused serious damage to the Mongols, who later regarded this battle as the most difficult one that had been fought against European foes. Western and eastern parts of the country alike put up serious resistance during the months following the battle of Muhi. The Mongols were reluctant to cross the Danube River because formidable Hungarian forces were gathering in Transdanubia (the western part of the country), and when they finally did cross the river in January 1242, they laid waste only to the vicinity of the main roads in those parts of the country. Although the extent of devastation was staggering, the country was able to recover from it in a few years, and would have been ready to face a second Mongol invasion if it had materialised.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18778/3071-7779.2024.1.02

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. CFHH 3. 1938. Catalogus Fontium Hungariae Historicae 3. A.F. Gombos (ed.), Budapestini.
  2. Hermann R. (ed.), 2017. Magyarország hadtörténete 1. Budapest.
  3. Katona T. (ed.), 1981. A tatárjárás emlékezete. Budapest.
  4. Laszlovszky J., Pow S., Romhányi B.F., Ferenczi F., Pinke Z. 2018. Contextualizing the Mongol Invasion of Hungary in 1241–42: Short and Long Term Perspectives. “The Hungarian Historical Review” 7(3), 419–450.
  5. Nagy B. (ed.), 2003. Tatárjárás. Budapest.
  6. SRH 2. 1938. Scriptores rerum Hungaricarum 2. E. Szentpétery (ed.), Budapestini.

Metadata

Authors
Sebők, F.
Venue
Faces of War
Published
2024-12-30
Issue
1
Pages
17-26
ISSN
  • 3071-8597
  • 3071-7779
Cited by
0
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.