The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indicators of Digital Leadership in the Context of K-12 Education
Open accessAbstract
International Society for Technology in Education Standards for Administrators (ISTE-A, 2009) has been published for six years and but few studies have been done to indicate digital leadership indicators. This qualitative study aims to explore digital leadership indicators in the context of K-12 education based on ISTE-A standards. Results show that visionary leadership is indicated as integrated technology vision and technology plan support by all stakeholders. Indicators of digital age learning culture include sufficient devices, technology modeling, and effective technology utilization. Digital learning opportunities and digital learning community are indicators of professional development. Indicators of systemic improvement include maximized learning achievement, competed personnel, and strategic partnership. Digital citizenship is indicated as digital filter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In other words, experienced teachers must be reflective practitioners (Zhong, 2017).”
From Influence of the Principal's Digital Leadership on the Reflective Practices of Vocational Teachers Mediated by Trust, Self Efficacy, and Work Engagement (2020) · cites this paper as Zhong, 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Chang, I. H. (2012). The effect of principals' technological leadership on teachers' technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 328-340.
- Creswell, J. R. (2013). Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Garcia, A. & Abrego, C. (2014). Vital skills of the elementary principal as a technology leaders. Journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership, 12(1), 12-25.
- Hadjithoma-Garstka, C (2011). The role of the principal's leadership style in the implementation of ICT policy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 311-326.
- Karnjanapun, S. (2013). Teachers' technology leadership assessment: A comparative case study of Thailand and the U.S.A. I n . J a n H e r r i n g t o n e t a l . ( E d s . ) , Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013, 2099-2107.
- Jan, A. Q. (2012). Exploratory study of a principal's teachnology (ICT) leadership practices in the rural context of Pakistan (Unpublished master's dissertation). Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
- Pritchard, K. (2014). Recommendations for K-12 administrators for technology integration. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014, 957-961. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- Raman, A., Don, Y., and Kasim, A. L. (2014). The relationship between principals' technology leadership and teachers' technology use in Malaysian secondary school. Asian Social Science, 10(18), 30- 36.
- Richardson, J. W., Bathon, J., Flora, K. L., & Lewis, W. D. (2012). NETS-A scholarship: A review of published literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 131-151.
- Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Weng, C. & Tang, Y. (2014). The relationship between technology leadership strategies and effectiveness of school administration: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 76(1), 91-107.
- Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Cited by
Agustina, R., Kamdi, W., Hadi, S., Muladi, M., & Nurhadi, D. (2020) · International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.11.2 · Cited by 43
Chen, J., & Kouhsari, M. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105232 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhong, L.
- Affiliations
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhong, Lin
- ORCID
- Zhong, Lin
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange
- Publisher
- University of Southern Mississippi
- Published
- 2017-06-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1941-8027 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-8035
- OpenAlex
- W2902373362
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- digital leadership, K-12 education, educational administrators, visionary leadership, technology integration, learning culture, professional development, digital citizenship, digital filters, strategic partnership, academic performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
