The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Confirming Experience: Being Present during Reflective Conversations
Abstract
If sketching is a reflective conversation, then confirming the qualities of one’s experience is a major skill. This paper presents a discussion about the difficulties and importance of confirming experience for designers. The paper is concerned with role of experience for industrial designers, as they apply their discipline skills and knowledge, to explore frames and solution opportunities, through sketch development. Research into meditation is used to consider the training needs of designers to support them in becoming a reflective practitioner. The paper argues that designing for a project community means connecting deeply with the narratives of people within that community, being mindful of these narratives while exploring frames and solution opportunities and being responsive to the changes in one’s experience during sketch experimentation. The paper concludes that the skill of connecting with one’s experience of the present moment supports reflective conversations and can be consciously developed to the benefit of design practitioners.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The current results imply that mindfulness should be differentiated as a personal trait [52] and as an ability that is acquired as a result of practice [53,54].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wielgus, B., Urban, W., Patriak, A., & Cichocki, Ł. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17238764 · Cited by 51
“The current results imply that mindfulness should be differentiated as a personal trait [52] and as an ability that is acquired as a result of practice [53,54].”
BackgroundValidation of the Polish adaptation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire
Radoń, S. (2017) · Roczniki Psychologiczne · Cited by 14
Validation of the Polish version of the Short Form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire
Radoń, S., & Rydzewska, M. (2018) · Roczniki Psychologiczne · doi:10.18290/rpsych.2018.21.3-5 · Cited by 12
Stillness as a Competence of Design Intelligence
Rojas, F., Spencer, N., & English, S. G. (2012) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2012.117 · Cited by 1
Self-citationEducating the mindful designer: Exploring Mindfulness Practices in Design Education
Iberbuden, A. (2023) · International Association of Societies of Design Research Congress (IASDR) · doi:10.21606/iasdr.2023.764 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Spencer, N.
- Venue
- Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal—Annual Review
- Publisher
- Common Ground Research Networks
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 355-366
- ISSN
- 1833-1874 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-5736
- OpenAlex
- W1492598630
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Design Principles and Practices An International Journal—Annual Review (publishedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Keywords
- reflective practice, design sketching, meditation, mindfulness, designer training, industrial design, narrative in design, present-moment awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review