The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intercultural Design Competence: A Guide for Graphic Designers Working Across Cultural Boundaries
Abstract
Research specifically addressing intercultural understanding within graphic design is quite limited. However, an examination of the field of verbal communication proved that many of the cultural issues faced by contemporary graphic designers are also faced by other communication professionals. There is a wealth of information in verbal communication discussing cultural understanding and intercultural concerns that can provide key insights for visual communication. Additionally, many practicing graphic designers have real-life experiences addressing the varied cultural backgrounds of their audiences and incorporating that understanding into their work. By combining a review of existing communication literature along with insights from multiple interviews, this article proposes a new approach for graphic designers working across cultural boundaries. This approach is labeled Intercultural Design Competence (IDC). The goal of IDC is to move beyond theoretical approaches and provide a tactical guide for designers to reference in order to more successfully incorporate cultural understanding into their work. By considering the changing nature of the graphic design profession, the increasing necessity of addressing cultural influences, and the complex relationship between culture and communication, IDC integrates motivation to be culturally-sensitive, design and research skills, and appropriate cultural knowledge in order to create more appropriate, effective, and satisfying designs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although prior works had revealed how culture factors might influence the understanding of visual language [53] and users' trust in avatar design [1,53], their influence on design process remained unclear.”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
He, Q., Zheng, W., Bao, H., Chen, R., & Tong, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium of Chinese CHI · doi:10.1145/3629606.3629675 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- McMullen, M.
- Corresponding author
- McMullen, Melissa
- Venue
- The International Journal of Visual Design
- Publisher
- Common Ground Research Networks
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 19-30
- ISSN
- 2325-1581 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-159X
- OpenAlex
- W3121014925
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Journal of Visual Design (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Graphic Design and Typography
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cultural and Communication Design Research
- Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
- Keywords
- graphic design, cultural understanding, intercultural communication, cultural sensitivity, visual communication, verbal communication, cultural knowledge, design practice, cultural influence on design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review