Cited by 5Enzyme Production and CharacterizationComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesBiofuel production and bioconversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Isolation and Identification of Cellulose Degrading Bacteria from Banana Peel Compost

Open access
P., Yendania Grevitara, F., Badriyatur Rahma, P., Hellen Septirangga, Y., Irma Dahlia, Suarsini, Endang·2019·El-Hayah:Jurnal Biologi

Abstract

Cellulolytic bacteria are bacteria that have the ability to hydrolyze cellulose complexes into smaller oligosaccharides and eventually become glucose. Glucose is used as a carbon and energy source for bacterial growth. This study was conducted to isolate the cellulose degrading bacteria from banana peel compost that produce cellulose enzymes based on the clear zone that visible around the colony. The cellulolytic activity was determined by the ability of bacteria to hydrolyze the Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC) substrate. Determination of cellulolytic activity is known based on cellulolytic index calculation, the diameter total minus the diameter of the colony and divided by the diameter of the colony. The result of five bacterial isolates was found but only one bacterium had the potential to be a cellulose degradation. Based on the Microbact Gram-Negative Identification System, the bacterium is Burkholderia cepacia. These bacteria have an important role in nature as decomposers of various complex compounds, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and pectin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18860/elha.v7i1.7241

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lamid, M., Nugroho, T.P., Chusniati, S. dan Rochiman, K. 2011. Eksplorasi bakteri selulolitik asal cairan rumen sapi potong sebagai bahan inokulum limbah pertanian. Jurnal Ilmiah Kedokteran Hewan 4(1): 37-42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
P., Y. G., F., B. R., P., H. S., Y., I. D., & Suarsini, E.
Affiliations
State University of Malang (ID)
Venue
El-Hayah:Jurnal Biologi
Published
2019-05-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
6-11
ISSN
  • 2086-0064 (ISSN-L)
  • 2657-0726
OpenAlex
W2956666879
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
El-Hayah Jurnal Biologi (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
cellulolytic bacteria, cellulolytic activity, Burkholderia cepacia, carboxymethyl cellulose hydrolysis, cellulase production, bacterial isolation, composting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review