The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COMMUNITY AND PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS OF WOODY SPECIES IN WET TROPICAL FORESTS
Open accessAbstract
We compare the distribution of reproductive traits in woody vegetation of 10 wet tropical forests in northeastern Costa Rica.Based on quantitative sampling of seedlings, saplings, and trees, we assess whether particular sexual systems, pollination syndromes, or seed-dispersal modes are associated with successional stage, prior selective logging, woody growth forms, or patterns of abundance or rarity.We further examine the phylogenetic structure of these traits in the regional woody flora, testing explicit hypotheses regarding phylogenetic clustering of reproductive traits and habitat distributions.Animal dispersal and insect pollination predominate across all forest types and size classes.In second-growth trees, relative abundance of species with explosive dispersal, hermaphroditic flowers, and insect pollination is higher, and relative abundance of species with animal dispersal and mammal pollination is lower, compared to old-growth and logged forests.Overall, dioecy and wind dispersal are more frequent than expected in canopy trees, and hermaphroditic flowers are more frequent than expected in shrubs.Reproductive traits, growth-form traits, and relative abundance patterns show significant clustering within the supertree phylogeny.Patterns of trait distribution across forest types are closely linked with patterns of floristic composition at the genus and family level.Species-level associations among reproductive traits and woody growth form can be explained by phylogenetic correlations.Wind dispersal and hummingbird pollination are significantly concentrated in clades with hermaphroditic flowers, whereas wind pollination is concentrated in clades with unisexual flowers.Legacies of both phylogenetic history and forest disturbance structure the distribution of reproductive traits within and among tropical wet forest communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Maddison, W. P. (1990) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05937.x · Cited by 533
Cited by
Phylogenies and Community Ecology
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 · Cited by 4,609
Self-citationLosos, J. B. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x · Cited by 1,728
Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances
Chazdon, R. L. (2003) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1078/1433-8319-00042 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationNeutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence
HUBBELL, S. P. (2005) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00965.x · Cited by 895
Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time
Emerson, B. C., & Gillespie, R. G. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.005 · Cited by 708
Metadata
- Authors
- Chazdon, R. L., Careaga, S., Webb, C., & Vargas, O.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-348
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099513062
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMMUNITY AND PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS OF WOODY SPECIES IN WET TROPICAL FORESTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/02-4037
- The paper
- Chazdon, R. L., Careaga, S., Webb, C., & Vargas, O. (2003). COMMUNITY AND PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS OF WOODY SPECIES IN WET TROPICAL FORESTS. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-4037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.