Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FEEDBACKS BETWEEN SOIL NUTRIENTS AND LARGE HERBIVORES IN A MANAGED SAVANNA ECOSYSTEM

Augustine, David J., McNaughton, Samuel J., Frank, Douglas A.·2003·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Small‐scale fertilization experiments have shown that soil nutrients limit plant productivity in many semiarid grasslands and savannas, but linkages among nutrients, grasses, and grazers are rarely studied in an ecosystem context. We used hectare‐scale heterogeneity in soil nutrients created by cattle management practices within a geologically homogeneous savanna to examine relationships among soil nitrogen and phosphorus, aboveground net primary production (ANPP), grass nutrient content, and a mixed community of native and domestic herbivores on central Kenyan rangeland. Increasing soil N and P content was consistently associated with increasing plant productivity and rainfall use efficiency in wet, dry, and drought years. A fertilization experiment and analyses of grass N:P ratios across sites indicated that N is the primary limiting nutrient on nutrient‐rich glades, whereas N and P co‐limit productivity on nutrient‐poor bushland sites. Variation in ANPP among patches within the landscape was linearly correlated with consumption rates of large herbivores. Grazing pressure was consistently high (>60% of ANPP) at all but one site in a dry year (1999), and was greater in nutrient‐rich glades (73 ± 4% of ANPP) than in nutrient‐poor bushland sites (43 ± 7% of ANPP) in a wet year (2001). Grasses of nutrient‐rich sites contained sufficient P concentrations to meet requirements for pregnant and lactating ungulates, whereas grasses in nutrient‐poor swards were P deficient. Even though native and domestic herbivores selectively used and intensively grazed nutrient‐rich sites, productivity on these sites remained high throughout the study. Analyses of nitrogen budgets for nutrient‐rich and nutrient‐poor sites showed that large herbivores themselves caused a net N input to the former and a net N loss from the latter. Thus, large herbivores not only respond to heterogeneity in soil and plant nutrients across the landscape, but also play a role in maintaining the N‐enriched status of highly productive and intensively grazed sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/02-5283

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Augustine, D. J., McNaughton, S. J., & Frank, D. A.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
1325-1337
ISSN
  • 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5582
OpenAlex
W2163660461
Cited by
284
References
54
FWCI
21.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FEEDBACKS BETWEEN SOIL NUTRIENTS AND LARGE HERBIVORES IN A MANAGED SAVANNA ECOSYSTEM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/02-5283
The paper
Augustine, D. J., McNaughton, S. J., & Frank, D. A. (2003). FEEDBACKS BETWEEN SOIL NUTRIENTS AND LARGE HERBIVORES IN A MANAGED SAVANNA ECOSYSTEM. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-5283

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.