The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A model-framed evaluation of elephant effects on tree and fire dynamics in African savannas.
Open accessAbstract
There is a concern that high densities of elephants in southern Africa could lead to the overall reduction of other forms of biodiversity. We present a grid‐based model of elephant–savanna dynamics, which differs from previous elephant–vegetation models by accounting for woody plant demographics, tree–grass interactions, stochastic environmental variables (fire and rainfall), and spatial contagion of fire and tree recruitment. The model projects changes in height structure and spatial pattern of trees over periods of centuries. The vegetation component of the model produces long‐term tree–grass coexistence, and the emergent fire frequencies match those reported for southern African savannas. Including elephants in the savanna model had the expected effect of reducing woody plant cover, mainly via increased adult tree mortality, although at an elephant density of 1.0 elephant/km 2 , woody plants still persisted for over a century. We tested three different scenarios in addition to our default assumptions. (1) Reducing mortality of adult trees after elephant use, mimicking a more browsing‐tolerant tree species, mitigated the detrimental effect of elephants on the woody population. (2) Coupling germination success (increased seedling recruitment) to elephant browsing further increased tree persistence, and (3) a faster growing woody component allowed some woody plant persistence for at least a century at a density of 3 elephants/km 2 . Quantitative models of the kind presented here provide a valuable tool for exploring the consequences of management decisions involving the manipulation of elephant population densities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation
Caswell, H. (2001) · Cited by 3,014
Tree-Grass Interactions in Savannas
Scholes, R. J., & Archer, S. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.517 · Cited by 2,579
Opportunistic Management for Rangelands Not at Equilibrium
Westoby, M., Walker, B., & Noy‐Meir, I. (1989) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3899492 · Cited by 1,841
Wickens, G. E., & White, F. B. (1985) · Kew Bulletin · doi:10.2307/4108277 · Cited by 1,442
Fire, resprouting and variability: a recipe for grass–tree coexistence in savanna
Higgins, S. I., Bond, W. J., & Trollope, W. S. W. (2000) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00435.x · Cited by 1,087
Bond, W. J., & van Wilgen, B. W. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,062
Megaherbivores: The Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology
Owen-Smith, R. N. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565441 · Cited by 955
Megaherbivores: The Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology
Owen‐Smith, N. (1988) · Cited by 882
Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions
Yoda, K. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 858
Bond, W. J., & van Wilgen, B. W. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1499-5 · Cited by 850
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Frost P. G. H. andP.Robertson.1987. The ecological effects of fire in savannas. Pages 93–140inB. H. Walker editor. Determinants of tropical savannas. Springer-Verlag Berlin Germany.
- Kiker G. A.1998. Development and comparison of savanna ecosystem models to explore the concept of carrying capacity. Dissertation. Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
- Norton-Griffiths M.1979. The influence of grazing browsing and fire on the vegetation dynamics of the Serengeti. Pages 310–352inA. R. E. Sinclair and M. Norton-Griffiths editors. Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press Chicago Illinois USA.
- Rutherford M. C.1997. Categorization of biomes. Pages 91– 98inR. M. Cowling D. M. Richardson and S. M. Pierce editors. Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK.
- Scholes R. J.1997. Savanna. Pages 258–277inR. M. Cowling D. M. Richardson and S. M. Pierce editors. Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK.
- Starfield A. M., 1993, A frame-based paradigm for dynamic ecosystem models, AI Applications, 7, 1
- Thomson P. J., 1975, The role of elephants, fire and other agents in the decline of a Brachystegia boehmii woodland, Journal of the Southern African Wildlife Management Association, 5, 11
- Tyson P. D., 1978, The predicted above-normal rainfall of the seventies and the likelihood of droughts in the eighties in South Africa, South African Journal of Science, 74, 372
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Woody cover in African savannas: the role of resources, fire and herbivory.
Sankaran, M., Ratnam, J., & Hanan, N. (2008) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00360.x · Cited by 589
A Disease-Mediated Trophic Cascade in the Serengeti and its Implications for Ecosystem C
Holdo, R. M., Sinclair, A. R. E., Dobson, A. P., Metzger, K. L., Bolker, B. M., Ritchie, M. E., & Holt, R. D. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000210 · Cited by 298
Browsing and fire interact to suppress tree density in an African savanna
Staver, A. C., Bond, W. J., Stock, W. D., van Rensburg, S. J., & Waldram, M. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-1907.1 · Cited by 295
The movement of African elephants in a human‐dominated land‐use mosaic
Graham, M. D., Douglas‐Hamilton, I., Adams, W. M., & Lee, P. C. (2009) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00272.x · Cited by 276
Savanna woody plant dynamics: the role of fire and herbivory, separately and synergistically
Midgley, J. J., Lawes, M. J., & Chamaillé‐Jammes, S. (2010) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt09034 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, P. W. J., & Getz, W. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Baxter, Peter W. J.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1331-1341
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2164481256
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.qut.edu.au
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0090323)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Keywords
- elephant browsing, savanna dynamics, tree-grass coexistence, fire regimes, woody plant cover, tree mortality, seedling recruitment, southern African savanna, elephant management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review