The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CO-INERTIA ANALYSIS AND THE LINKING OF ECOLOGICAL DATA TABLES
Open accessAbstract
Ecological studies often require studying the common structure of a pair of data tables. Co-inertia analysis is a multivariate method for coupling two tables. It is often neglected by ecologists who prefer the widely used methods of redundancy analysis and canonical correspondence analysis. We present the co-inertia criterion for measuring the adequacy between two data sets. Co-inertia analysis is based on this criterion as are canonical correspondence analysis or canonical correlation analysis, but the latter two have additional constraints. Co-inertia analysis is very flexible and allows many possibilities for coupling. Co-inertia analysis is suitable for quantitative and/or qualitative or fuzzy environmental variables. Moreover, various weighting of sites and various transformations and/or centering of species data are available for this method. Hence, more ecological considerations can be taken into account in the statistical procedures. Moreover, the principle of this method is very general and can be easily extended to the case of distance matrices or to the case of more than two tables. Simulated ecological data are used to compare the co-inertia approach with other available methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data
Legendre, P., & Gallagher, E. D. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420100716 · Cited by 5,556
Cited by
Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and Within Humans
Muegge, B. D., Kuczynski, J., Knights, D., Clemente, J. C., González, A., Fontana, L., Henrissat, B., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198719 · Cited by 1,988
Tap, J., Derrien, M., Törnblom, H., Brazeilles, R., Cools-Portier, S., Doré, J., Störsrud, S., Le Nevé, B., Öhman, L., & Simrén, M. (2017) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.049 · Cited by 642
Partial Least Squares Methods: Partial Least Squares Correlation and Partial Least Square Regression
Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2013) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-059-5_23 · Cited by 448
Balaresque, P., Poulet, N., Cussat-Blanc, S., Gerard, P., Quintana-Murci, L., Heyer, E., & Jobling, M. A. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.285 · Cited by 89
Sanabria, C., Dubs, F., Lavelle, P., Fonte, S. J., & Barot, S. (2016) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.03.008 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Dray, S., Chessel, D., & Thioulouse, J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3078-3089
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165384723
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CO-INERTIA ANALYSIS AND THE LINKING OF ECOLOGICAL DATA TABLES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/03-0178
- The paper
- Dray, S., Chessel, D., & Thioulouse, J. (2003). CO-INERTIA ANALYSIS AND THE LINKING OF ECOLOGICAL DATA TABLES. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
