The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE DUAL ROLE OF FLORAL TRAITS: POLLINATOR ATTRACTION AND PLANT DEFENSE
Abstract
Plants are under siege from a diversity of enemies that consume both leaf and floral parts. Plants resist damage to leaves in a variety of ways, and we now have a rich literature documenting how plants defend themselves against herbivore attack. In contrast, the mechanisms by which plants resist enemies that consume floral parts or resources are much less known, even though damage to floral tissue usually has tighter links to plant fitness than damage to leaf tissue. Many plants experience nectar robbing, whereby floral visitors remove nectar from flowers, often without pollinating. Nectar robbers can reduce plant fitness to degrees comparable to, or even surpassing, reduction by herbivores. However, because nectar attracts both pollinators and nectar robbers, plants face a dilemma in defending against nectar robbers without also deterring pollinators. Here, we extend the conceptual framework of resistance to herbivores to include resistance to nectar robbers, focusing on nectar traits. We review published data and find that an array of nectar traits may deter robbers without deterring pollinators. Although resistance traits against robbers have been broadly identified, the costs and benefits of these traits in terms of plant fitness remain poorly understood. We present data showing that a nectar trait (dilute nectar) might directly, as well as indirectly, benefit plant fitness by deterring nectar-robbing bumble bees of Ipomopsis aggregata without deterring hummingbird pollinators. However, the magnitude of any plant fitness benefit will depend on the degree to which plants are pollen- vs. resource-limited in a given year. The results of our work offer both conceptual and empirical insight into how plants cope with attack by nonpollinating floral visitors through a relatively unexplored trait, nectar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants
Agrawal, A. A., Laforsch, C., & Tollrian, R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43425 · Cited by 862
The Production of Dilute Nectars by Hummingbird and Honeyeater Flowers
Pyke, G. H., & Waser, N. M. (1981) · Biotropica · doi:10.2307/2387804 · Cited by 278 · cited 1×
“However, dilute nectar with low viscosity might not deter some legitimate pollinators, such as hummingbirds, that feed by capillary action (Baker and Baker 1982; but see Pyke and Waser 1981, Martı́nez del Rio et al. 2001).”
Cited by
Explaining intraspecific diversity in plant secondary metabolites in an ecological context
Moore, B. D., Andrew, R. L., Külheim, C., & Foley, W. J. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12526 · Cited by 533
Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory
McCall, A. C., & Irwin, R. E. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00975.x · Cited by 478
Self-citationHow plant?animal interactions signal new insights in communication
SCHAEFER, H., SCHAEFER, V, & LEVEY, D. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.08.003 · Cited by 329
Plant behaviour and communication
Karban, R. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01183.x · Cited by 294
SPECIALIZED BEES FAIL TO DEVELOP ON NON-HOST POLLEN: DO PLANTS CHEMICALLY PROTECT THEIR POLLEN
Praz, C. J., Müller, A., & Dorn, S. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0751.1 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Irwin, R. E., Adler, L. S., & Brody, A. K.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1503-1511
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163369687
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE DUAL ROLE OF FLORAL TRAITS: POLLINATOR ATTRACTION AND PLANT DEFENSE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/03-0390
- The paper
- Irwin, R. E., Adler, L. S., & Brody, A. K. (2004). THE DUAL ROLE OF FLORAL TRAITS: POLLINATOR ATTRACTION AND PLANT DEFENSE. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0390
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.