Cited by 105Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

THE PERSISTENCE OF QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) IN THE GRAND MESA AREA, COLORADO

Kulakowski, Dominik, Veblen, Thomas T., Drinkwater, Sarah·2004·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Human activities have caused the decline of numerous species and ecosystems. To promote ecosystem resilience, recent management efforts aim to maintain ecosystem patterns and processes within their historical range of variability. There has been substantial concern that quaking aspen, the most widely distributed tree in North America and the most important deciduous tree in the subalpine forests of the Rocky Mountains, has declined significantly in the western landscape during the 20th century. This reported decline has been attributed to conifer encroachment associated with fire exclusion, as well as other causes. To assess long‐term changes in the extent of quaking aspen in a 175 000‐ha study area in western Colorado, we used a Geographic Information System to compare an 1898 map of vegetation and fires to a modern map of present forest cover types. Based on this comparison, a larger portion of the current landscape is dominated by quaking aspen relative to the late 19th century, a period of extensive burning in this area. During the 20th century, aspen was persistent over most of its extent, even in the absence of fire. Fires of the late 19th century also increased aspen cover in stands that were previously dominated by spruce and fir. The trend toward increased aspen was greater at lower elevations. The total area where spruce and fir have replaced aspen is small in comparison to the area where aspen has increased or has persisted. The successional replacement of aspen by…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/03-5160

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Growth in sapling height over small spatiotemporal scales may be the least important aspect of aspen demography for maintaining clones.

    “Although relatively easy to measure (and quite eye-catching), the growth in sapling height over small spatiotemporal scales may be the least important aspect of aspen demography involved in the maintenance of clones (Kulakowski et al. 2004).”

    From Trophic Cascades in a Multicausal World: Isle Royale and Yellowstone (2014) · cites this paper as Kulakowski et al. 2004

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 105

Authors
Kulakowski, D., Veblen, T. T., & Drinkwater, S.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Kulakowski, Dominik
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
1603-1614
ISSN
  • 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5582
OpenAlex
W2160235435
Cited by
105
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
Populus tremuloides, conifer encroachment, fire suppression, historical range of variability, long-term vegetation change, ecosystem resilience, Colorado Rocky Mountains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review