The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RURAL LAND-USE TRENDS IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES, 1950–2000
Open accessAbstract
In order to understand the magnitude, direction, and geographic distribution of land-use changes, we evaluated land-use trends in U.S. counties during the latter half of the 20th century. Our paper synthesizes the dominant spatial and temporal trends in population, agriculture, and urbanized land uses, using a variety of data sources and an ecoregion classification as a frame of reference. A combination of increasing attractiveness of nonmetropolitan areas in the period 1970–2000, decreasing household size, and decreasing density of settlement has resulted in important trends in the patterns of developed land. By 2000, the area of low-density, exurban development beyond the urban fringe occupied nearly 15 times the area of higher density urbanized development. Efficiency gains, mechanization, and agglomeration of agricultural concerns has resulted in data that show cropland area to be stable throughout the Corn Belt and parts of the West between 1950 and 2000, but decreasing by about 22% east of the Mississippi River. We use a regional case study of the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern regions to focus in more detail on the land-cover changes resulting from these dynamics. Dominating were land-cover changes associated with the timber practices in the forested plains ecoregions and urbanization in the piedmont ecoregions. Appalachian ecoregions show the slowest rates of land-cover change. The dominant trends of tremendous exurban growth, throughout the United States, and conversion and abandonment of agricultural lands, especially in the eastern United States, have important implications because they affect large areas of the country, the functioning of ecological systems, and the potential for restoration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States: Evolution of a Hierarchical Spatial Framework
Omernik, J. M., & Griffith, G. E. (2014) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1 · Cited by 1,003
Cropland expansion outpaces agricultural and biofuel policies in the United States
Lark, T. J., Meghan Salmon, J., & Gibbs, H. K. (2015) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044003 · Cited by 484
Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009–2019
Kovacs, K. F., Haight, R. G., McCullough, D. G., Mercader, R. J., Siegert, N. W., & Liebhold, A. M. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.004 · Cited by 456
Ecological homogenization of urban USA
Groffman, P. M., Cavender-Bares, J., Bettez, N. D., Grove, J. M., Hall, S. J., Heffernan, J. B., Hobbie, S. E., Larson, K. L., Morse, J. L., Neill, C., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/120374 · Cited by 448
Strawberry fields forever? Urban agriculture in developed countries: a review
Mok, H.-F., Williamson, V. G., Grove, J. R., Burry, K., Barker, S. F., & Hamilton, A. J. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0156-7 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, D. G., Johnson, K. M., Loveland, T. R., & Theobald, D. M.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1851-1863
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145346369
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RURAL LAND-USE TRENDS IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES, 1950–2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/03-5220
- The paper
- Brown, D. G., Johnson, K. M., Loveland, T. R., & Theobald, D. M. (2005). RURAL LAND-USE TRENDS IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES, 1950–2000. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.