The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HYDROLOGIC REGIMES AND RIPARIAN FORESTS: A STRUCTURED POPULATION MODEL FOR COTTONWOOD
Abstract
Riparian cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests form the one of the most extensive deciduous forest ecosystems in arid regions of the western United States. However, cottonwood populations are threatened by flow alteration and channel degradation caused by dams, water diversions, and groundwater pumping. We developed a stochastic, density-dependent, population model to (1) consolidate information concerning cottonwood population dynamics in a conceptual and analytical framework, (2) determine whether complex forest stand dynamics can be predicted from basic cottonwood vital rates and river hydrology, and (3) aid in planning prescribed floods by projecting how altered flow regimes might affect populations. The model describes how annual variation in the hydrograph affects cottonwood mortality (via floods and droughts) and recruitment (via scouring of new habitat and seedling establishment). Using parameter values for the undammed Yampa River in Colorado, we found that abundances of seedlings and younger trees followed a boom–bust cycle driven by high flood mortalities while reproductive adult abundance followed a less erratic 5–15-yr periodicity driven by multiyear sequences of flows favorable to stand recruitment. Conversely, chance occurrences of multiple drought years eliminated cottonwood from up to 50% of available habitat, providing opportunities for competing plant species to establish. By simulating flow alterations on the Yampa ranging from channelization (many floods/droughts) to damming (few floods/droughts), the model suggested that mature cottonwood forest should be most abundant near the observed natural flow regime. Model analysis also suggested that flow regimes with high flood frequencies result in stable (albeit small) population sizes, while stable flows result in highly variable population sizes prone to local extinction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aguilar, R., Ashworth, L., Galetto, L., & Aizen, M. A. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x · Cited by 1,079
Gurnell, A. M., Bertoldi, W., & Corenblit, D. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.005 · Cited by 502
Poff, N. L. (2018) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.13038 · Cited by 389
Flow regime alteration degrades ecological networks in riparian ecosystems
Tonkin, J. D., Merritt, D. M., Olden, J. D., Reynolds, L. V., & Lytle, D. A. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0379-0 · Cited by 283
Self-citationMODELING THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN RIVER MORPHODYNAMICS AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION
Camporeale, C., Perucca, E., Ridolfi, L., & Gurnell, A. M. (2013) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/rog.20014 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Lytle, D. A., & Merritt, D. M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2493-2503
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126277855
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HYDROLOGIC REGIMES AND RIPARIAN FORESTS: A STRUCTURED POPULATION MODEL FOR COTTONWOOD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/04-0282
- The paper
- Lytle, D. A., & Merritt, D. M. (2004). HYDROLOGIC REGIMES AND RIPARIAN FORESTS: A STRUCTURED POPULATION MODEL FOR COTTONWOOD. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.