The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TESTING FOR LATITUDINAL BIAS IN DIVERSIFICATION RATES: AN EXAMPLE USING NEW WORLD BIRDS
Abstract
Study of the latitudinal diversity gradient to date has focused largely on pattern description, with relatively little work on the possible mechanisms underlying the pattern. One proximate mechanism is a latitudinal bias in the discrepancy between speciation and extinction rates, leading to higher rates of species diversification toward lower latitudes. Despite being central to many explanations for high tropical diversity, this mechanism is tested very rarely. We discuss some of the problems involved in testing for latitudinal bias in diversification rates and present an example phylogenetic analysis for endemic bird genera of the New World. The results provide evidence for higher diversification rates in clades inhabiting lower latitudes, both when genera are considered independent and when phylogeny is controlled for using independent contrasts. High rates of diversification are also associated with larger geographic area and higher net primary productivity, although these do not fully account for the latitudinal effect. The latitudinal pattern is stronger in younger clades, supporting the prediction of a simple model in which the signal of latitudinal bias in diversification rates diminishes as clades age and become saturated with species. Our study demonstrates that a clade-based approach can help answer important questions that a geographic approach cannot, but large phylogenies and geographic databases are needed to cope with the large amount of noise inherent in this type of analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecology Drives the Worldwide Distribution of Human Diseases
Guernier, V., Hochberg, M. E., & Guégan, J.-F. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020141 · Cited by 693
The tropics as a source of evolutionary novelty through geological time
Jablonski, D. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/364142a0 · Cited by 255
Cited by
The global diversity of birds in space and time
Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K., & Mooers, A. O. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11631 · Cited by 3,934
Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography
Mittelbach, G. G., Schemske, D. W., Cornell, H. V., Allen, A. P., Brown, J. M., Bush, M. B., Harrison, S. P., Hurlbert, A. H., Knowlton, N., Lessios, H. A., et al. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01020.x · Cited by 1,751
The Latitudinal Gradient in Recent Speciation and Extinction Rates of Birds and Mammals
Weir, J. T., & Schluter, D. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1135590 · Cited by 632
Rabosky, D. L. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01333.x · Cited by 448
Ecological drivers of global gradients in avian dispersal inferred from wing morphology
Sheard, C., Neate-Clegg, M. H. C., Alioravainen, N., Jones, S. E. I., Vincent, C., MacGregor, H. E. A., Bregman, T. P., Claramunt, S., & Tobias, J. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16313-6 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Cardillo, M., Orme, C. D. L., & Owens, I. P. F.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2278-2287
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965432007
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TESTING FOR LATITUDINAL BIAS IN DIVERSIFICATION RATES: AN EXAMPLE USING NEW WORLD BIRDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/05-0112
- The paper
- Cardillo, M., Orme, C. D. L., & Owens, I. P. F. (2005). TESTING FOR LATITUDINAL BIAS IN DIVERSIFICATION RATES: AN EXAMPLE USING NEW WORLD BIRDS. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.