The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MICROBIAL COMMUNITY VARIATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH NITROGEN MINERALIZATION IN HISTORICALLY ALTERED FORESTS
Abstract
Past land use can impart soil legacies that have important implications for ecosystem function. Although these legacies have been linked with microbially mediated processes, little is known about the long-term influence of land use on soil microbial communities themselves. We examined whether historical land use affected soil microbial community composition (lipid profiles) and whether community composition was related to potential net nitrogen (N) mineralization rates in southern Appalachian (USA) forest stands abandoned from agriculture or logging and reforested >50 yr ago. Microbial community composition was determined by a hybrid procedure of phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis. We found that community composition varied significantly with past land use. Communities in formerly farmed stands had a higher relative abundance of markers for gram-negative bacteria and a lower abundance of markers for fungi compared with previously logged and reference (i.e., no disturbance history) stands. Potential net N mineralization rates were negatively correlated with fungal and gram-negative bacterial markers in both farmed and reference stands, and fungal abundance and soil bulk density effectively predicted mineralization rates in all stands. Our results indicate that the alteration of microbial communities by historical land use may influence the ecosystem processes they mediate. This is in contrast to typical expectations about microbial community resilience to change. Here, the decrease in fungal abundance observed from disturbance appeared to result in decreased nitrogen mineralization over the long term.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
Cited by
Agathokleous, E., Feng, Z., Oksanen, E., Sicard, P., Wang, Q., Saitanis, C. J., Araminiene, V., Blande, J. D., Hayes, F., Calatayud, V., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc1176 · Cited by 382
Flooding effects on soil microbial communities
Unger, I. M., Kennedy, A. C., & Muzika, R.-M. (2009) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.01.007 · Cited by 306
Soil Biota as Drivers of Plant Community Assembly
Kardol, P., De Long, J. R., & Mariotte, P. (2018) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91614-9_13 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraterrigo, J. M., Balser, T. C., & Turner, M. G.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 570-579
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163716765
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MICROBIAL COMMUNITY VARIATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH NITROGEN MINERALIZATION IN HISTORICALLY ALTERED FORESTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/05-0638
- The paper
- Fraterrigo, J. M., Balser, T. C., & Turner, M. G. (2006). MICROBIAL COMMUNITY VARIATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH NITROGEN MINERALIZATION IN HISTORICALLY ALTERED FORESTS. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0638
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.