The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF A 15-YEAR DECLINE IN COVER OF THE CARIBBEAN REEF CORAL MONTASTRAEA ANNULARIS
Abstract
On Caribbean reefs, a striking trend of the last 25 years has been the decline in cover of the framework-building coral Montastraea annularis, a species that has dominated reefs throughout the region for millennia. Clearly, such losses are important ecologically, but to evaluate their significance fully, they need to be placed in the context of the proximal causes and balanced against the potential for gains in cover through growth and recruitment. In this study, a population of M. annularis in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, was censused annually from 1988 to 2003 to quantify coral cover and construct a size-based demographic model. The model was developed to explore the mechanisms of change in coral cover and to ascertain likely trajectories for future population growth. Over the study period, the cover of M. annularis declined from 41% in 1988, to 12% by 1999 (a 72% decline) but remained unchanged statistically for the last five years of the study. Between 1988 and 2003, colony abundances declined by 57% (from 47 colonies/m2 to 20 colonies/m2), and the losses were driven mostly by the death and fission of medium to large colonies (i.e., ≥151 cm2). By 2003, the population had proportionally more small colonies (70% were ≤50 cm2) and fewer large colonies (3% were >250 cm2) than in 1988 (60% and 6%, respectively), and the changes in population structure had accelerated ≥14% in terms of the rate of change in population size and the time necessary to attain equilibrium of colony size structure. Importantly, this analysis revealed an ongoing and imminent population decline coincident with the recent period of apparently stable coral cover. Fifty-year projections indicate the strong likelihood of extirpation of M. annularis at this particular site in St. John (in contrast to a continuation of constant low cover) and suggest that the 1988 population structure cannot be restored by recruitment. It is unlikely that the population decline will reverse until there is an amelioration of the conditions that kill individual colonies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY?
Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I., & Gough, L. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2381:witorb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,650
Cited by
Baums, I. B., Baker, A. C., Davies, S. W., Grottoli, A. G., Kenkel, C. D., Kitchen, S. A., Kuffner, I. B., LaJeunesse, T. C., Matz, M. V., Miller, M. W., et al. (2019) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1978 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Edmunds, P. J., & Elahi, R.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-18
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127304615
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF A 15-YEAR DECLINE IN COVER OF THE CARIBBEAN REEF CORAL MONTASTRAEA ANNULARIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/05-1081
- The paper
- Edmunds, P. J., & Elahi, R. (2007). THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF A 15-YEAR DECLINE IN COVER OF THE CARIBBEAN REEF CORAL MONTASTRAEA ANNULARIS. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.