EFFECTS OF ANTHROPOGENIC DEVELOPMENTS ON COMMON RAVEN NESTING BIOLOGY IN THE WEST MOJAVE DESERT
Abstract
Subsidized predators may affect prey abundance, distribution, and demography. Common Ravens (Corvus corax) are anthropogenically subsidized throughout their range and, in the Mojave Desert, have increased in number dramatically over the last 3–4 decades. Human‐provided food resources are thought to be important drivers of raven population growth, but human developments add other features as well, such as nesting platforms. From 1996 to 2000, we examined the nesting ecology of ravens in the Mojave Desert, relative to anthropogenic development. Ravens nested disproportionately near point sources of food and water subsidies (such as towns, landfills, and ponds) but not near roads (sources of road‐killed carrion), even though both sources of subsidy enhanced fledging success. Initiation of breeding activity was more likely when a nest from the previous year was present at the start of a breeding season but was not affected by access to food. The relative effect of environmental modifications on fledging success varied from year to year, but the effect of access to human‐provided resources was comparatively consistent, suggesting that humans provide consistently high‐quality breeding habitat for ravens. Anthropogenic land cover types in the desert are expected to promote raven population growth and to allow ravens to occupy parts of the desert that otherwise would not support them. Predatory impacts of ravens in the Mojave Desert can therefore be considered indirect effects of anthropogenic development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human subsidies have encouraged corvids and canids to reduce and shift their home ranges closer to subsidized resources.
“Human subsidies have also encouraged corvidsscavenging predators that fill a similar ecological niche as the caracaras-and canids to reduce and shift their home ranges closer to subsidized resources [55,56].”
From Seasonal activity levels of a farm-island population of striated caracaras (Phalcoboenus australis) in the Falkland Islands (2020) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- III, W. B. K., & Boarman, W. I.
- Affiliations
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1703-1713
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2124537483
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- Corvus corax, nesting biology, breeding habitat quality, fledging success, Mojave Desert
- MeSH terms
- Animals, California, Conservation of Natural Resources, Desert Climate, Geography, Humans, Nesting Behavior, Population Dynamics, Ecosystem, Crows
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review