Flightlessness and the energetic cost of wing molt in a large sea duck
Abstract
Although the replacement of feathers apparently represents the major event of somatic production in the annual cycle of wild birds, knowledge about the energetics of molt has always been hampered by logistical and technical difficulties, which are exacerbated by the fact that birds are able to compensate behaviorally to buffer any variation in energy demand. During wing molt, sea ducks (Mergini) and other diving birds lose all of their wing feathers at once, leading to a period of temporary flightlessness of variable duration, a condition that considerably restricts their movements and increases the probability of predation. In the present study, we present the first results aimed at quantifying the duration of flightlessness, energy expenditure, and foraging effort during molt of a wing-propelled diving bird, the Common Eider (Somateria mollissima). Data loggers were implanted in the body cavity of 13 females to record heart rate and hydrostatic pressure (depth) every two seconds for a period of 220 days. Flight frequency and duration were assessed from elevated and constant heart rate, and the absence of flight was used to quantify the duration of flightlessness, which lasted, on average, 36 +/- 8 days (mean +/- SD). Using a period of four weeks before and four weeks after the flightless period, we found that dive depth (ranging from 1 to 2 m, on average) and daily diving time did not vary during the course of the study. Daily metabolic rate increased by 9%, and resting met…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both breeding and moulting require a level of dependency on energy reserves for survival.
“Both breeding and moulting require a level of dependency on energy reserves for survival (Guillemette et al., 2007)”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Guillemette et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Guillemette, M., Pelletier, D., Grandbois, J.-M., & Butler, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Guillemette, Magella
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2936-2945
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001113894
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- wing molt, flightlessness, Somateria mollissima, diving birds, energy expenditure, resting metabolic rate, heart rate, dive depth, foraging effort, weight loss
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Diving, Ducks, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Flight, Animal, Time Factors, Wings, Animal, Weight Loss, Molting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review