The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HOW MANY ANIMALS REALLY DO THE LÉVY WALK?
Abstract
Lévy walks (LW) are superdiffusive and scale-free random walks that have recently emerged as a new conceptual tool for modeling animal search paths. They have been claimed to be more efficient than the "classical" random walks, and they also seem able to account for the actual search patterns of various species. This suggests that many animals may move using a LW process. LW patterns look like the actual search patterns displayed by animals foraging in a patchy environment, where extensive and intensive searching modes alternate, and which can be generated by a mixture of classical random walks. In this context, even elementary composite Brownian walks are more efficient than LW but may be confounded with them because they present apparent move-length-heavy tail distributions and superdiffusivity. The move-length "survival" distribution (i.e., the cumulative number of moves greater than any given threshold) appears to be a better means to highlight a LW pattern. Even once such a pattern has been clearly identified, it remains to determine how it was actually generated, because a LW pattern is not necessarily produced by a LW process but may emerge from the way the animal interacted with the environment structure through more classical movement processes. In any case, emergent movement patterns should not be confused with the processes that gave rise to them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Codling, E. A., Plank, M. J., & Benhamou, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0014 · Cited by 1,482
Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society
Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., Lazer, D., Redish, A. D., & Couzin, I. D. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.10.004 · Cited by 549
Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches
Viswanathan, G. M., Raposo, E. P., & da Luz, M. G. E. (2008) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2008.03.002 · Cited by 451
Parallel adaptation: one or many waves of advance of an advantageous allele?
Ralph, P., & Coop, G. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.110.119594 · Cited by 165
Idiothetic Path Integration in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster
Kim, I. S., & Dickinson, M. H. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.026 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Benhamou, S.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1962-1969
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017831033
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HOW MANY ANIMALS REALLY DO THE LÉVY WALK? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/06-1769.1
- The paper
- Benhamou, S. (2007). HOW MANY ANIMALS REALLY DO THE LÉVY WALK? Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1769.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.