The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FROM INDIVIDUALS TO ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF EVOLUTIONARY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY
Open accessAbstract
An important goal in ecology is developing general theory on how the species composition of ecosystems is related to ecosystem properties and functions. Progress on this front is limited partly because of the need to identify mechanisms controlling functions that are common to a wide range of ecosystem types. We propose that one general mechanism, rooted in the evolutionary ecology of all species, is adaptive foraging behavior in response to predation risk. To support our claim, we present two kinds of empirical evidence from plant‐based and detritus‐based food chains of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The first kind comes from experiments that explicitly trace how adaptive foraging influences ecosystem properties and functions. The second kind comes from a synthesis of studies that individually examine complementary components of particular ecosystems that together provide an integrated perspective on the link between adaptive foraging and ecosystem function. We show that the indirect effects of predators on plant diversity, plant productivity, nutrient cycling, trophic transfer efficiencies, and energy flux caused by consumer foraging shifts in response to risk are qualitatively different from effects caused by reductions in prey density due to direct predation. We argue that a perspective of ecosystem function that considers effects of consumer behavior in response to predation risk will broaden our capacity to explain the range of outcomes and contingencies in trophic control of ecosystems. This perspective also provides an operational way to integrate evolutionary and ecosystem ecology, which is an important challenge in ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park
Fortin, D., Beyer, H. L., Boyce, M. S., Smith, D. W., Duchesne, T., & Mao, J. S. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-0953 · Cited by 1,351 · cited 3×
“In particular, wolf presence caused elk to increase their proportional use of safe coniferous habitat at the expense of feeding in open grassland and aspen habitats (Ripple and Beschta 2004, Creel et al. 2005, Fortin et al. 2005).”
BackgroundWolves and the Ecology of Fear: Can Predation Risk Structure Ecosystems?
RIPPLE, W. J., & BESCHTA, R. L. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0755:wateof]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 813
ELK ALTER HABITAT SELECTION AS AN ANTIPREDATOR RESPONSE TO WOLVES
Creel, S., Winnie, J., Maxwell, B., Hamlin, K., & Creel, M. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/05-0032 · Cited by 774 · cited 5×
“There is, however, some uncertainty whether or not predator effects on local elk densities are largely determined by risk responses or by direct predation (Creel et al. 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialPredation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk
Creel, S., Christianson, D., Liley, S., & Winnie, J. A. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1135918 · Cited by 666
Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning
Duffy, J. E. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00494.x · Cited by 516
Effects of Moose Browsing on Vegetation and Litter of the Boreal Forest, Isle Royale, Michigan, USA
McInnes, P. F., Naiman, R. J., Pastor, J., & Cohen, Y. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941455 · Cited by 334
McIntosh, A. R., & Townsend, C. R. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333229 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Gessner, M. O., Swan, C. M., Dang, C. K., McKie, B. G., Bardgett, R. D., Wall, D. H., & Hättenschwiler, S. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.010 · Cited by 1,335
Behavioral responses to changing environments
Wong, B. B. M., & Candolin, U. (2015) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/aru183 · Cited by 1,065
Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes
Sih, A., Cote, J., Evans, M., Fogarty, S., & Pruitt, J. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01731.x · Cited by 888
Peckarsky, B. L., Abrams, P. A., Bolnick, D. I., Dill, L. M., Grabowski, J. H., Luttbeg, B., Orrock, J. L., Peacor, S. D., Preisser, E. L., Schmitz, O. J., et al. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1131.1 · Cited by 527
“…or more important than consumption to predator–prey population and community dynamics (Abrams 1990, Anholt and Werner 1995), often having associated indirect effects on other organisms in the community (e.g., Werner and Peacor 2003) and on ecosystem properties and functions (Schmitz et al. 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDiel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear
Kohl, M. T., Stahler, D. R., Metz, M. C., Forester, J. D., Kauffman, M. J., Varley, N., White, P. J., Smith, D. W., & MacNulty, D. R. (2018) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1313 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitz, O. J., Grabowski, J. H., Peckarsky, B. L., Preisser, E. L., Trussell, G. C., & Vonesh, J. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2436-2445
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2016061231
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FROM INDIVIDUALS TO ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF EVOLUTIONARY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/07-1030.1
- The paper
- Schmitz, O. J., Grabowski, J. H., Peckarsky, B. L., Preisser, E. L., Trussell, G. C., & Vonesh, J. R. (2008). FROM INDIVIDUALS TO ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF EVOLUTIONARY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1030.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.