Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BIOMASS RATHER THAN GROWTH RATE DETERMINES VARIATION IN NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION BY GIANT KELP

Reed, Daniel C., Rassweiler, Andrew, Arkema, Katie K.·2008·Ecology

Abstract

Net primary production (NPP) is influenced by disturbance‐driven fluctuations in foliar standing crop (FSC) and resource‐driven fluctuations in rates of recruitment and growth, yet most studies of NPP have focused primarily on factors influencing growth. We quantified NPP, FSC, recruitment, and growth rate for the giant kelp,Macrocystis pyrifera, at three kelp forests in southern California, USA, over a 54‐month period and determined the relative roles of FSC, recruitment, and growth rate in contributing to variation in annual NPP. Net primary production averaged between 0.42 and 2.38 kg dry mass·m−2·yr−1 at the three sites. The initial FSC present at the beginning of the growth year and the recruitment of new plants during the year explained 63% and 21% of the interannual variation observed in NPP, respectively. The previous year's NPP and disturbance from waves collectively accounted for 80% of the interannual variation in initial FSC. No correlation was found between annual growth rate (i.e., the amount of new kelp mass produced per unit of existing kelp mass) and annual NPP (i.e., the amount of new kelp mass produced per unit area of ocean bottom), largely because annual growth rate was consistent compared to initial FSC and recruitment, which fluctuated greatly among years and sites. Although growth rate was a poor predictor of variation in annual NPP, it was principally responsible for the high mean values observed for NPP by Macrocystis.These high mean values reflected rapid growth (average of ∼2% per day) of a relatively small standing crop (maximum annual mean = 444 g dry mass/m 2) that replaced itself approximately seven times per year. Disturbance‐driven variability in FSC may be generally important in explaining variation in NPP, yet it is rarely examined because cycles of disturbance and recovery occur over timescales of decades or more in many systems. Considerable insight into how variation in FSC drives variation in NPP may be gained by studying systems such as giant kelp forests that are characterized by frequent disturbance and rapid rates of growth and recruitment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/07-1106.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Reed, D. C., Rassweiler, A., & Arkema, K. K.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
89
Issue
9
Pages
2493-2505
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2103871279
Cited by
186
References
2
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BIOMASS RATHER THAN GROWTH RATE DETERMINES VARIATION IN NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION BY GIANT KELP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/07-1106.1
The paper
Reed, D. C., Rassweiler, A., & Arkema, K. K. (2008). BIOMASS RATHER THAN GROWTH RATE DETERMINES VARIATION IN NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION BY GIANT KELP. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1106.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.