Cited by 138Coral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management Studies

Larval quality is shaped by matrix effects: Implications for connectivity in a marine metapopulation

Shima, Jeffrey S., Swearer, Stephen E.·2009·Ecology

Abstract

Variation in the phenotype or "quality" of dispersing individuals can shape colonization success and thus local dynamics and patterns of connectivity in a metapopulation. In marine reef systems, larval dispersal typically connects fragmented populations, and larval quality may be shaped by developmental history at the natal reef (e.g., parental effects) and/or by conditions in the pelagic environment (e.g., food, temperature, hydrodynamics, predator regime). We extract information recorded within the incremental bands of fish "ear stones" (otoliths) to reconstruct the early life histories of reef fish, to evaluate whether larval quality is a function of natal populations, dispersal histories, or both. We sampled sagittal otoliths from 282 common triplefins (Forsterygion lapillum) collected at approximately weekly, intervals between December 2003 and March 2004, from three sites within Wellington Harbor (New Zealand) and three sites along the adjacent Wellington South Coast. We used image analysis to quantify otolith traits and to reconstruct five larval phenotypes (pelagic larval duration, size-at-hatch, early larval growth, late larval growth, and an instantaneous larval growth rate), followed by a principal components analysis to derive a composite measure of larval quality. We used laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to quantify otolith microchemistry, followed by a set of cluster analyses (based upon 13 statistical descriptors of time series for ea…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/08-0029.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shima, J. S., & Swearer, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Shima, Jeffrey S.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
1255-1267
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2100114862
Cited by
138
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Royal Society Te Apārangi
  • Victoria University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
larval quality, larval dispersal, metapopulation connectivity, otolith microchemistry, larval growth rate, pelagic larval duration, larval retention, nutrient enrichment
MeSH terms
Animals, Demography, Fishes, Larva, Trace Elements, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review