Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nutrient availability and phytoplankton nutrient limitation across a gradient of atmospheric nitrogen deposition

Elser, James J., Kyle, Marcia, Steger, Laura, Nydick, Koren R., Baron, Jill S.·2009·Ecology

Abstract

Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition to lakes and watersheds has been increasing steadily due to various anthropogenic activities. Because such anthropogenic N is widely distributed, even lakes relatively removed from direct human disturbance are potentially impacted. However, the effects of increased atmospheric N deposition on lakes are not well documented. We examined phytoplankton biomass, the absolute and relative abundance of limiting nutrients (N and phosphorus [P]), and phytoplankton nutrient limitation in alpine lakes of the Rocky Mountains of Colorado (USA) receiving elevated (>6 kg N·ha−1·yr−1) or low (<2 kg N·ha−1·yr−1) levels of atmospheric N deposition. High‐deposition lakes had higher NO 3‐N and total N concentrations and higher total N : total P ratios. Concentrations of chlorophyll and seston carbon (C) were 2–2.5 times higher in high‐deposition relative to low‐deposition lakes, while high‐deposition lakes also had higher seston C:N and C:P (but not N:P) ratios. Short‐term enrichment bioassays indicated a qualitative shift in the nature of phytoplankton nutrient limitation due to N deposition, as high‐deposition lakes had an increased frequency of primary P limitation and a decreased frequency and magnitude of response to N and to combined N and P enrichment. Thus elevated atmospheric N deposition appears to have shifted nutrient supply from a relatively balanced but predominantly N‐deficient regime to a more consistently P‐limited regime in Colorado alpine lakes. This adds to accumulating evidence that sustained N deposition may have important effects on lake phytoplankton communities and plankton‐based food webs by shifting the quantitative and qualitative nature of nutrient limitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/08-1742.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Elser, J. J., Kyle, M., Steger, L., Nydick, K. R., & Baron, J. S.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11
Volume
90
Issue
11
Pages
3062-3073
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2126444705
Cited by
183
References
2
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient availability and phytoplankton nutrient limitation across a gradient of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/08-1742.1
The paper
Elser, J. J., Kyle, M., Steger, L., Nydick, K. R., & Baron, J. S. (2009). Nutrient availability and phytoplankton nutrient limitation across a gradient of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1742.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.