The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuel treatment effects on tree‐based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios
Abstract
Forests are viewed as a potential sink for carbon (C) that might otherwise contribute to climate change. It is unclear, however, how to manage forests with frequent fire regimes to maximize C storage while reducing C emissions from prescribed burns or wildfire. We modeled the effects of eight different fuel treatments on tree‐based C storage and release over a century, with and without wildfire. Model runs show that, after a century of growth without wildfire, the control stored the most C. However, when wildfire was included in the model, the control had the largest total C emission and largest reduction in live‐tree‐based C stocks. In model runs including wildfire, the final amount of tree‐based C sequestered was most affected by the stand structure initially produced by the different fuel treatments. In wildfire‐prone forests, tree‐based C stocks were best protected by fuel treatments that produced a low‐density stand structure dominated by large, fire‐resistant pines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176 · cited 3×
“2008), and that these changes may increase the number of large fire events (Westerling et al. 2006).”
BackgroundProtocol for Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants
(2005) · doi:10.1007/1-4020-2985-3 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests
Thom, D., & Seidl, R. (2016) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12193 · Cited by 770
Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions
Prichard, S. J., Hessburg, P. F., Hagmann, R. K., Povak, N. A., Dobrowski, S. Z., Hurteau, M. D., Kane, V. R., Keane, R. E., Kobziar, L. N., Kolden, C. A., et al. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2433 · Cited by 336
Self-citationClimate, Environment, and Disturbance History Govern Resilience of Western North American Forests
Hessburg, P. F., Miller, C. L., Parks, S. A., Povak, N. A., Taylor, A. H., Higuera, P. E., Prichard, S. J., North, M. P., Collins, B. M., Hurteau, M. D., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00239 · Cited by 308
Self-citationAn ecosystem management strategy for Sierran mixed-conifer forests
North, M., Stine, P., O'Hara, K., Zielinski, W., & Stephens, S. (2009) · doi:10.2737/psw-gtr-220 · Cited by 214
Self-citationFire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed‐conifer carbon stocks and emissions
North, M., Hurteau, M., & Innes, J. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-1173.1 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurteau, M., & North, M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-27
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 409-414
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9309
- OpenAlex
- W1980657720
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuel treatment effects on tree‐based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/080049
- The paper
- Hurteau, M., & North, M. (2009). Fuel treatment effects on tree‐based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1890/080049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.