The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A quantitative analysis of temporal turnover in aquatic species assemblages across ecosystems
Abstract
Recent meta‐analyses have shown that beta diversity through space is jointly driven by species traits, geographical gradients, and ecosystem properties. Spatial variation is, however, only one aspect of beta diversity. The other component is variation in species assemblages through time, that is, temporal turnover. We examined the decrease of assemblage similarity in time in aquatic ecosystems in relation to several ecological, physical, and geographical factors using an extensive data set derived from the literature. The data set was first divided into intra‐annual and interannual studies depending on the temporal extent of the studies. Sampling duration was one the most significant variables affecting the degree of temporal turnover, and we found that turnover was faster in studies with shorter temporal extent. Our results further suggested that the rate of temporal turnover increased with increasing ecosystem size, thus contradicting the general species–time–area relationship. Temporal turnover also varied among the ecosystem types: lake assemblages showed faster turnover than stream or marine assemblages in the interannual data set. We found that temporal turnover exhibited large‐scale geographical variation, as there was a latitudinal gradient in turnover. Turnover was faster in the tropics in the intra‐annual data set, but the pattern was reversed in the interannual data set, where turnover was faster at high latitudes. Finally, we found that the degree of temporal turnover was related to organism characteristics, as larger organisms with active mobility showed slower temporal turnover than smaller organisms. Our results suggest that the degree of species turnover in time is jointly driven by several ecological, physical, and geographical factors in aquatic ecosystems and that the turnover is not uniform across taxonomic groups. Our findings have important consequences for understanding how different biotic assemblages track temporal changes in the environment and how resilient assemblages are toward such changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7 · Cited by 3,387
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Cited by
Magurran, A. E., Baillie, S. R., Buckland, S. T., Dick, J. M., Elston, D. A., Scott, E. M., Smith, R. I., Somerfield, P. J., & Watt, A. D. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.016 · Cited by 940
Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research
Hillebrand, H., & Matthiessen, B. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01388.x · Cited by 591
Self-citationMyers, J. A., Chase, J. M., Jiménez, I., Jørgensen, P. M., Araujo‐Murakami, A., Paniagua‐Zambrana, N., & Seidel, R. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12021 · Cited by 470
Seasonality and predictability shape temporal species diversity
Tonkin, J. D., Bogan, M. T., Bonada, N., Rios‐Touma, B., & Lytle, D. A. (2017) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.1761 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Korhonen, J. J., Soininen, J., & Hillebrand, H.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 508-517
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2039898243
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative analysis of temporal turnover in aquatic species assemblages across ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/09-0392.1
- The paper
- Korhonen, J. J., Soininen, J., & Hillebrand, H. (2010). A quantitative analysis of temporal turnover in aquatic species assemblages across ecosystems. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0392.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.