Flower color influences insect visitation in alpine New Zealand
Abstract
Despite a long‐standing belief that insect pollinators can select for certain flower colors, there are few experimental demonstrations that free‐flying insects choose between natural flowers based on color. We investigated responses of insect visitors to experimental manipulations of flower color in the New Zealand alpine. Native syrphid flies ( Allograpta and Platycheirus ) and solitary bees ( Hylaeus and Leioproctus ) showed distinct preferences for visiting certain flower species. These responses were determined, in part, by flower color, as insects also responded to experimental manipulations of visible petal color in 7 out of 11 tests with different combinations of flower species and insect type. When preferences were detected, syrphid flies chose yellow over white petals regardless of flower species, whereas Hylaeus chose white over yellow Ourisia glandulosa . In some cases, the strength and direction of color preference depended on the context of other floral traits, in which case the response usually favored the familiar, normal combination of traits. Syrphid flies also visited in response to floral morphological traits but did not show preference based on UV reflectance. The unusually high preponderance of white flowers in the New Zealand alpine is not explained by complete generalization of flower color choice. Instead, the insect visitors show preferences based on color, including colors other than white, along with other floral traits. Furthermore, they can respond in complex ways to combinations of floral cues, suggesting that traits may act in nonadditive ways in determining pollinator visitation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pollinators exhibit foraging preferences, disproportionately visiting flowers of particular colors, as documented in both controlled laboratory settings and natural field conditions.
“Extensive studies—both in controlled laboratory settings and natural field conditions—have documented pollinators exhibiting foraging preferences, in which they disproportionately visit flowers of particular colors”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2010
Cites
Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies
Moran, M. D. (2003) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12010.x · Cited by 1,484 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
Briggs, H. M., Graham, S., Switzer, C. M., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/210377 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Campbell, D. R., Bischoff, M., Lord, J. M., & Robertson, A. W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Massey University (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Campbell, Diane R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2638-2649
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2130894360
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Keywords
- flower color, pollinator visitation, hoverflies, Allograpta, Platycheirus, Hylaeus, Leioproctus, alpine flowers, floral cues, ultraviolet reflectance, flower morphology, pollinator foraging behavior
- MeSH terms
- Altitude, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Insecta, New Zealand, Pigmentation, Plants, Ecosystem, Flowers, Pollination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review