Cited by 127Plant and animal studiesInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

Flower color influences insect visitation in alpine New Zealand

Campbell, Diane R., Bischoff, Mascha, Lord, Janice M., Robertson, Alastair W.·2010·Ecology

Abstract

Despite a long‐standing belief that insect pollinators can select for certain flower colors, there are few experimental demonstrations that free‐flying insects choose between natural flowers based on color. We investigated responses of insect visitors to experimental manipulations of flower color in the New Zealand alpine. Native syrphid flies ( Allograpta and Platycheirus ) and solitary bees ( Hylaeus and Leioproctus ) showed distinct preferences for visiting certain flower species. These responses were determined, in part, by flower color, as insects also responded to experimental manipulations of visible petal color in 7 out of 11 tests with different combinations of flower species and insect type. When preferences were detected, syrphid flies chose yellow over white petals regardless of flower species, whereas Hylaeus chose white over yellow Ourisia glandulosa . In some cases, the strength and direction of color preference depended on the context of other floral traits, in which case the response usually favored the familiar, normal combination of traits. Syrphid flies also visited in response to floral morphological traits but did not show preference based on UV reflectance. The unusually high preponderance of white flowers in the New Zealand alpine is not explained by complete generalization of flower color choice. Instead, the insect visitors show preferences based on color, including colors other than white, along with other floral traits. Furthermore, they can respond in complex ways to combinations of floral cues, suggesting that traits may act in nonadditive ways in determining pollinator visitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/09-0941.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pollinators exhibit foraging preferences, disproportionately visiting flowers of particular colors, as documented in both controlled laboratory settings and natural field conditions.

    “Extensive studies—both in controlled laboratory settings and natural field conditions—have documented pollinators exhibiting foraging preferences, in which they disproportionately visit flowers of particular colors”

    From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, D. R., Bischoff, M., Lord, J. M., & Robertson, A. W.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Massey University (NZ)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Diane R.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09
Volume
91
Issue
9
Pages
2638-2649
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2130894360
Cited by
127
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
flower color, pollinator visitation, hoverflies, Allograpta, Platycheirus, Hylaeus, Leioproctus, alpine flowers, floral cues, ultraviolet reflectance, flower morphology, pollinator foraging behavior
MeSH terms
Altitude, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Insecta, New Zealand, Pigmentation, Plants, Ecosystem, Flowers, Pollination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review