Multi‐scale controls of historical forest‐fire regimes: new insights from fire‐scar networks
Abstract
Anticipating future forest‐fire regimes under changing climate requires that scientists and natural resource managers understand the factors that control fire across space and time. Fire scars – proxy records of fires, formed in the growth rings of long‐lived trees – provide an annually accurate window into past low‐severity fire regimes. In western North America, networks of the fire‐scar records spanning centuries to millennia now include hundreds to thousands of trees sampled across hundreds to many thousands of hectares. Development of these local and regional fire‐scar networks has created a new data type for ecologists interested in landscape and climate regulation of ecosystem processes – which, for example, may help to explain why forest fires are widespread during certain years but not others. These data also offer crucial reference information on fire as a dynamic landscape process for use in ecosystem management, especially when managing for forest structure and resilience to climate change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Climate played a significant role in synchronizing widespread fire activity across local to regional scales, although this was muted by Indigenous fire management at local and landscape scales in particular places during particular periods of time.
“Climate played a significant role in synchronizing widespread fire activity across local to regional scales (46), although this was muted by Indigenous fire management at local and landscape scales in particular places during particular periods of time (21).”
From Tree rings reveal persistent Western Apache (Ndee) fire stewardship and niche construction in the American Southwest (2025) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 263
- Authors
- Falk, D. A., Heyerdahl, E. K., Brown, P. M., Farris, C., Fulé, P. Z., McKenzie, D., Swetnam, T. W., Taylor, A. H., & Van Horne, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- National Park Service (US)
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Falk, Donald A
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-22
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 446-454
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9309
- OpenAlex
- W2171216656
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Michigan Technological University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Keywords
- historical fire regimes, fire scars, low-severity fire, forest resilience, ecosystem management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review