The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: a multiregional assessment
Open accessAbstract
Human impacts on watershed hydrology are widespread in the US, but the prevalence and severity of stream‐flow alteration and its potential ecological consequences have not been quantified on a national scale. We assessed streamflow alteration at 2888 streamflow monitoring sites throughout the conterminous US. The magnitudes of mean annual (1980–2007) minimum and maximum streamflows were found to have been altered in 86% of assessed streams. The occurrence, type, and severity of streamflow alteration differed markedly between arid and wet climates. Biological assessments conducted on a subset of these streams showed that, relative to eight chemical and physical covariates, diminished flow magnitudes were the primary predictors of biological integrity for fish and macroinvertebrate communities. In addition, the likelihood of biological impairment doubled with increasing severity of diminished streamflows. Among streams with diminished flow magnitudes, increasingly common fish and macroinvertebrate taxa possessed traits characteristic of lake or pond habitats, including a preference for fine‐grained substrates and slow‐moving currents, as well as the ability to temporarily leave the aquatic environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Random forests for classification in ecology
Cutler, D. R., Edwards, T. C., Beard, K. H., Cutler, A., Hess, K. T., Gibson, J., & Lawler, J. J. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0539.1 · Cited by 4,950
Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems
Nilsson, C., Reidy, C. A., Dynesius, M., & Revenga, C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1107887 · Cited by 3,509
Cited by
High‐resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management
Lehner, B., Liermann, C. R., Revenga, C., Vörösmarty, C., Fekete, B., Crouzet, P., Döll, P., Endejan, M., Frenken, K., Magome, J., et al. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/100125 · Cited by 2,515
Safe and just Earth system boundaries
Rockström, J., Gupta, J., Qin, D., Lade, S. J., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Bai, X., Bala, G., Bunn, S. E., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8 · Cited by 1,400
Grill, G., Lehner, B., Lumsdon, A. E., MacDonald, G. K., Zarfl, C., & Reidy Liermann, C. (2015) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/015001 · Cited by 646
The impacts of climate change on ecosystem structure and function
Grimm, N. B., Chapin, F. S., Bierwagen, B., Gonzalez, P., Groffman, P. M., Luo, Y., Melton, F., Nadelhoffer, K., Pairis, A., Raymond, P. A., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/120282 · Cited by 647
Poff, N. L. (2018) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.13038 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlisle, D. M., Wolock, D. M., & Meador, M. R.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-25
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 264-270
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9309
- OpenAlex
- W2102356867
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: a multiregional assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/100053
- The paper
- Carlisle, D. M., Wolock, D. M., & Meador, M. R. (2011). Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: a multiregional assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1890/100053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.