Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Height‐growth response to climatic changes differs among populations of Douglas‐fir: a novel analysis of historic data

Leites, Laura P., Robinson, Andrew P., Rehfeldt, Gerald E., Marshall, John D., Crookston, Nicholas L.·2012·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Projected climate change will affect existing forests, as substantial changes are predicted to occur during their life spans. Species that have ample intraspecific genetic differentiation, such as Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii(Mirb.) Franco), are expected to display population‐specific growth responses to climate change. Using a mixed‐effects modeling approach, we describe three‐year height (HT) growth response to changes in climate of interior Douglas‐fir populations. We incorporate climate information at the population level, yielding a model that is specific to both species and population. We use data from provenance tests from previous studies that comprised 236 populations from Idaho, Montana, and eastern Washington, USA. The most sensitive indicator of climate was the mean temperature of the coldest month. Population maximum HT and HT growth response to changes in climate were dependent on seed source climate. All populations had optimum HT growth when transferred to climates with warmer winters; those originating in sites with the warmest winters were taller across sites and had highest HT growth at transfer distances closest to zero; those from colder climates were shortest and had optimum HT growth when transferred the farthest. Although this differential response damped the height growth differences among populations, cold‐climate populations still achieved their maximum growth at lower temperatures than warm‐climate populations. The results highlight the relevance of understanding climate change impacts at the population level, particularly in a species with ample genetic variation among populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/11-0150.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Leites, L. P., Robinson, A. P., Rehfeldt, G. E., Marshall, J. D., & Crookston, N. L.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
154-165
ISSN
  • 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5582
OpenAlex
W2102111287
Cited by
162
References
1
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Height‐growth response to climatic changes differs among populations of Douglas‐fir: a novel analysis of historic data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/11-0150.1
The paper
Leites, L. P., Robinson, A. P., Rehfeldt, G. E., Marshall, J. D., & Crookston, N. L. (2012). Height‐growth response to climatic changes differs among populations of Douglas‐fir: a novel analysis of historic data. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0150.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.