The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robustness of variance and autocorrelation as indicators of critical slowing down
Open accessAbstract
Ecosystems close to a critical threshold lose resilience, in the sense that perturbations can more easily push them into an alternative state. Recently, it has been proposed that such loss of resilience may be detected from elevated autocorrelation and variance in the fluctuations of the state of an ecosystem due to critical slowing down; the underlying generic phenomenon that occurs at critical thresholds. Here we explore the robustness of autocorrelation and variance as indicators of imminent critical transitions. We show both analytically and in simulations that variance may sometimes decrease close to a transition. This can happen when environmental factors fluctuate stochastically and the ecosystem becomes less sensitive to these factors near the threshold, or when critical slowing down reduces the ecosystem's capacity to follow high‐frequency fluctuations in the environment. In addition, when available data is limited, variance can be systematically underestimated due to the prevalence of low frequencies close to a transition. By contrast, autocorrelation always increases toward critical transitions in our analyses. To exemplify this point, we provide cases of rising autocorrelation and increasing or decreasing variance in time series prior to past climate transitions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early-warning signals for critical transitions
Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V., Held, H., van Nes, E. H., Rietkerk, M., & Sugihara, G. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08227 · Cited by 4,854
Self-citationRegime shifts in ecological systems can occur with no warning
Hastings, A., & Wysham, D. B. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01439.x · Cited by 338
Cited by
Pronounced loss of Amazon rainforest resilience since the early 2000s
Boulton, C. A., Lenton, T. M., & Boers, N. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01287-8 · Cited by 681
Bridging knowledge systems to enhance governance of environmental commons: A typology of settings
Rathwell, K. J., Armitage, D., & Berkes, F. (2015) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.584 · Cited by 154
Wichers, M., Smit, A. C., & Snippe, E. (2020) · Journal for Person-Oriented Research · doi:10.17505/jpor.2020.22042 · Cited by 103
Multisensory integration and behavioral stability
Roy, C., Dalla Bella, S., Pla, S., & Lagarde, J. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01273-4 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Dakos, V., van Nes, E. H., D'Odorico, P., & Scheffer, M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 264-271
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2171351474
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness of variance and autocorrelation as indicators of critical slowing down. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/11-0889.1
- The paper
- Dakos, V., van Nes, E. H., D'Odorico, P., & Scheffer, M. (2012). Robustness of variance and autocorrelation as indicators of critical slowing down. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0889.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.