Cited by 326Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAgronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Root depth distribution and the diversity–productivity relationship in a long‐term grassland experiment

Open access

Abstract

The relationship between plant diversity and productivity in grasslands could depend, partly, on how diversity affects vertical distributions of root biomass in soil; yet, no prior study has evaluated the links among diversity, root depth distributions, and productivity in a long‐term experiment. We used data from a 12‐year experiment to ask how plant species richness and composition influenced both observed and expected root depth distributions of plant communities. Expected root depth distributions were based on the abundance of species in each community and two traits of species that were measured in monocultures: root depth distributions and root‐to‐shoot ratios. The observed proportion of deep‐root biomass increased more than expected with species richness and was positively correlated with aboveground productivity. Indeed, the proportion of deep‐root biomass explained variation in productivity even after accounting for legume presence/abundance and greater nitrogen availability in diverse plots. Diverse plots had root depth distributions that were twice as deep as expected from their species composition and corresponding monoculture traits, partly due to interactions between C 4 grasses and legumes. These results suggest that the productivity of diverse plant communities was partly dependent on belowground plant interactions that caused roots to be distributed more deeply in soil.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/12-1399.1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The underlying relationships between plant diversity and soil carbon storage, soil microbial biomass and activity, and root biomass have been reported in several independent experimental settings, providing some evidence that the proposed links are of general significance.

    “Although we cannot rule out that the proposed mechanisms are particularly pronounced at the field site of The Jena Experiment, the underlying relationships between plant diversity and soil carbon storage 17,24 , soil microbial biomass and activity 37,45,46 , and root biomass 24,47 have been reported in several independent experimental settings providing some evidence that the proposed links are of”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 326

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. SAS Institute, 2007, JMP version 7.0.2

Authors
Mueller, K. E., Tilman, D., Fornara, D. A., & Hobbie, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Kevin E.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
787-793
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2082493148
Cited by
326
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
root depth distribution, diversity-productivity relationship, plant species richness, floristic composition, root-shoot ratio, aboveground productivity, C4 grasses, Fabaceae, nitrogen availability, grassland biodiversity, long-term grassland experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review