Human and biophysical influences on fire occurrence in the United States
Abstract
National‐scale analyses of fire occurrence are needed to prioritize fire policy and management activities across the United States. However, the drivers of national‐scale patterns of fire occurrence are not well understood, and how the relative importance of human or biophysical factors varies across the country is unclear. Our research goal was to model the drivers of fire occurrence within ecoregions across the conterminous United States. We used generalized linear models to compare the relative influence of human, vegetation, climate, and topographic variables on fire occurrence in the United States, as measured by MODIS active fire detections collected between 2000 and 2006. We constructed models for all fires and for large fires only and generated predictive maps to quantify fire occurrence probabilities. Areas with high fire occurrence probabilities were widespread in the Southeast, and localized in the Mountain West, particularly in southern California, Arizona, and New Mexico. Probabilities for large‐fire occurrence were generally lower, but hot spots existed in the western and south‐central United States The probability of fire occurrence is a critical component of fire risk assessments, in addition to vegetation type, fire behavior, and the values at risk. Many of the hot spots we identified have extensive development in the wildland–urban interface and are near large metropolitan areas. Our results demonstrated that human variables were important predictors of both all fires and large fires and frequently exhibited nonlinear relationships. However, vegetation, climate, and topography were also significant variables in most ecoregions. If recent housing growth trends and fire occurrence patterns continue, these areas will continue to challenge policies and management efforts seeking to balance the risks generated by wildfires with the ecological benefits of fire.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human influence on fire regimes nationally in the US remains poorly understood.
“Although recent human influence on fire regimes has been studied at local (13) to regional scales (14), human influence nationally remains poorly understood (10).”
From Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
Geographic variation in regional and continental-scale fire activity in the US is strongly associated with proxies for human-caused changes such as population density, road density, and land-use and development patterns.
“Geographic variability in regional and continental-scale fire activity in the United States is strongly tied to proxies for these human-caused changes, including population and road density, and different land-use and development patterns (10–15).”
From Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 109 · Cited by 143
- Authors
- Hawbaker, T. J., Radeloff, V. C., Stewart, S. I., Hammer, R. B., Keuler, N. S., & Clayton, M. K.
- Affiliations
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Radeloff, Volker C.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 565-582
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2026648454
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- National Interagency Fire Center
- U.S. Forest Service
- Northern Research Station
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Keywords
- wildfire occurrence, human influence on fire, biophysical factors, vegetation, climate, topography, large wildfires, fire hotspots, wildland-urban interface, fire risk assessment, ecoregions, housing growth
- MeSH terms
- Demography, Fires, Humans, Human Activities, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Models, Statistical, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review