The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prescribed burning in southwestern Australian forests
Abstract
Prescribed burning is an important but often controversial fire‐management tool in fire‐prone regions of the world. Here, we explore the complex challenges of prescribing fire for multiple objectives in the eucalypt forests of southwestern Australia, which could be regarded as a model for temperate landscapes elsewhere. Prescribed fire has been used in a coordinated manner to manage fuels in Australia's eucalypt forests since the 1950s and continues to be an important tool for mitigating the impacts of unplanned wildfires on human society and on a broad range of ecosystem services. Prescribed fire is increasingly being used to manage fire regimes at the local and landscape scales to achieve biodiversity outcomes through maintenance of spatial and temporal patterns of post‐fire seral stages. The prescribed burning program in southwestern eucalypt forests has been informed by a long‐term program of applied research into fire behavior and fire ecology. To remain successful in the future, the prescribed burning program in this region will need to adapt to changing expectations of government and the community, emerging land‐use issues, resource limitations, and a drying climate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.
Fernandes, P. M., & Botelho, H. S. (2003) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf02042 · Cited by 718
Fire in Mediterranean Ecosystems: Ecology, Evolution and Management
Keeley, J. E., Bond, W. J., Bradstock, R. A., Pausas, J. G., & Rundel, P. W. (2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139033091 · Cited by 479
Prescribed burning in southern Europe: developing fire management in a dynamic landscape
Fernandes, P. M., Davies, G. M., Ascoli, D., Fernández, C., Moreira, F., Rigolot, E., Stoof, C. R., Vega, J. A., & Molina, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/120298 · Cited by 401
Wittkuhn, R. S., McCaw, L., Wills, A. J., Robinson, R., Andersen, A. N., Van Heurck, P., Farr, J., Liddelow, G., & Cranfield, R. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.037 · Cited by 54
Cited by
Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change
Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Veraverbeke, S., Andela, N., Lasslop, G., Forkel, M., Smith, A. J. P., Burton, C., Betts, R. A., van der Werf, G. R., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2020rg000726 · Cited by 1,332
Fire effects on soils: the human dimension
Santín, C., & Doerr, S. H. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0171 · Cited by 312
Prescribed fire and its impacts on ecosystem services in the UK
Harper, A. R., Doerr, S. H., Santin, C., Froyd, C. A., & Sinnadurai, P. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.161 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Burrows, N., & McCaw, L.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- s1
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9309
- OpenAlex
- W1971160862
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prescribed burning in southwestern Australian forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/120356
- The paper
- Burrows, N., & McCaw, L. (2013). Prescribed burning in southwestern Australian forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1890/120356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.