The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies
Open accessAbstract
Quantifying and assessing changes in biological diversity are central aspects of many ecological studies, yet accurate methods of estimating biological diversity from sampling data have been elusive. Hill numbers, or the effective number of species, are increasingly used to characterize the taxonomic, phylogenetic, or functional diversity of an assemblage. However, empirical estimates of Hill numbers, including species richness, tend to be an increasing function of sampling effort and, thus, tend to increase with sample completeness. Integrated curves based on sampling theory that smoothly link rarefaction (interpolation) and prediction (extrapolation) standardize samples on the basis of sample size or sample completeness and facilitate the comparison of biodiversity data. Here we extended previous rarefaction and extrapolation models for species richness (Hill number q D , where q = 0) to measures of taxon diversity incorporating relative abundance (i.e., for any Hill number q D , q > 0) and present a unified approach for both individual‐based (abundance) data and sample‐based (incidence) data. Using this unified sampling framework, we derive both theoretical formulas and analytic estimators for seamless rarefaction and extrapolation based on Hill numbers. Detailed examples are provided for the first three Hill numbers: q = 0 (species richness), q = 1 (the exponential of Shannon's entropy index), and q = 2 (the inverse of Simpson's concentration index). We developed a bootstrap method for constructing confidence intervals around Hill numbers, facilitating the comparison of multiple assemblages of both rarefied and extrapolated samples. The proposed estimators are accurate for both rarefaction and short‐range extrapolation. For long‐range extrapolation, the performance of the estimators depends on both the value of q and on the extrapolation range. We tested our methods on simulated data generated from species abundance models and on data from large species inventories. We also illustrate the formulas and estimators using empirical data sets from biodiversity surveys of temperate forest spiders and tropical ants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological Meltdown in Predator-Free Forest Fragments
Terborgh, J., Lopez, L., Nuñez, P., Rao, M., Shahabuddin, G., Orihuela, G., Riveros, M., Ascanio, R., Adler, G. H., Lambert, T. D., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064397 · Cited by 1,656
Estimation of entropy and mutual information
Paninski, L. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603321780272 · Cited by 1,442
Cited by
How Should Beta-Diversity Inform Biodiversity Conservation?
Socolar, J. B., Gilroy, J. J., Kunin, W. E., & Edwards, D. P. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.005 · Cited by 1,414
Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers
Seibold, S., Gossner, M. M., Simons, N. K., Blüthgen, N., Müller, J., Ambarlı, D., Ammer, C., Bauhus, J., Fischer, M., Habel, J. C., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3 · Cited by 1,314
Peripheral T cell expansion predicts tumour infiltration and clinical response
Wu, T. D., Madireddi, S., de Almeida, P. E., Banchereau, R., Chen, Y.-J. J., Chitre, A. S., Chiang, E. Y., Iftikhar, H., O’Gorman, W. E., Au-Yeung, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2056-8 · Cited by 770
Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities
Gossner, M. M., Lewinsohn, T. M., Kahl, T., Grassein, F., Boch, S., Prati, D., Birkhofer, K., Renner, S. C., Sikorski, J., Wubet, T., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20575 · Cited by 706
Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world’s largest reforestation programme
Hua, F., Wang, X., Zheng, X., Fisher, B., Wang, L., Zhu, J., Tang, Y., Yu, D. W., & Wilcove, D. S. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12717 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Hsieh, T. C., Sander, E. L., Ma, K. H., Colwell, R. K., & Ellison, A. M.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-67
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2171783890
- Cited by
- 4,256
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 54.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/13-0133.1
- The paper
- Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Hsieh, T. C., Sander, E. L., Ma, K. H., Colwell, R. K., & Ellison, A. M. (2014). Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.