The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectroscopic determination of leaf morphological and biochemical traits for northern temperate and boreal tree species
Abstract
The morphological and biochemical properties of plant canopies are strong predictors of photosynthetic capacity and nutrient cycling. Remote sensing research at the leaf and canopy scales has demonstrated the ability to characterize the biochemical status of vegetation canopies using reflectance spectroscopy, including at the leaf level and canopy level from air‐ and spaceborne imaging spectrometers. We developed a set of accurate and precise spectroscopic calibrations for the determination of leaf chemistry (contents of nitrogen, carbon, and fiber constituents), morphology (leaf mass per area, Marea), and isotopic composition (δ 15 N) of temperate and boreal tree species using spectra of dried and ground leaf material. The data set consisted of leaves from both broadleaf and needle‐leaf conifer species and displayed a wide range in values, determined with standard analytical approaches: 0.7–4.4% for nitrogen (Nmass), 42–54% for carbon (Cmass), 17–58% for fiber (acid‐digestible fiber, ADF), 7–44% for lignin (acid‐digestible lignin, ADL), 3–31% for cellulose, 17–265 g/m 2 for Marea, and −9.4‰ to 0.8‰ for δ 15 N. The calibrations were developed using a partial least‐squares regression (PLSR) modeling approach combined with a novel uncertainty analysis. Our PLSR models yielded model calibration (independent validation shown in parentheses) R2 and the root mean square error (RMSE) values, respectively, of 0.98 (0.97) and 0.10% (0.13%) for Nmass, R2 = 0.77 (0.73) and RMSE = 0.88% (0.95%) for Cmass, R2 = 0.89 (0.84) and RMSE = 2.8% (3.4%) for ADF, R2 = 0.77 (0.69) and RMSE = 2.4% (3.9%) for ADL, R2 = 0.77 (0.72) and RMSE = 1.4% (1.9%) for leaf cellulose, R2 = 0.62 (0.60) and RMSE = 0.91‰ (1.5‰) for δ 15 N, and R2 = 0.88 (0.87) with RMSE = 17.2 g/m 2 (22.8 g/m 2) for Marea. This study demonstrates the potential for rapid and accurate estimation of key foliar traits of forest canopies that are important for ecological research and modeling activities, with a single calibration equation valid over a wide range of northern temperate and boreal species and leaf physiognomies. The results provide the basis to characterize important variability between and within species, and across ecological gradients using a rapid, cost‐effective, easily replicated method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D., & Muratore, J. F. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936780 · Cited by 2,641
Wold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H., & Dunn, III (1984) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0905052 · Cited by 2,529
Cited by
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Observing terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle from space
Schimel, D., Pavlick, R., Fisher, J. B., Asner, G. P., Saatchi, S., Townsend, P., Miller, C., Frankenberg, C., Hibbard, K., & Cox, P. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12822 · Cited by 585
Self-citationA roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models
Rogers, A., Medlyn, B. E., Dukes, J. S., Bonan, G., von Caemmerer, S., Dietze, M. C., Kattge, J., Leakey, A. D. B., Mercado, L. M., Niinemets, Ü., et al. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14283 · Cited by 552
Self-citationProgressive forest canopy water loss during the 2012–2015 California drought
Asner, G. P., Brodrick, P. G., Anderson, C. B., Vaughn, N., Knapp, D. E., & Martin, R. E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1523397113 · Cited by 397
Quantifying forest canopy traits: Imaging spectroscopy versus field survey
Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Anderson, C. B., & Knapp, D. E. (2015) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.011 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Serbin, S. P., Singh, A., McNeil, B. E., Kingdon, C. C., & Townsend, P. A.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1651-1669
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2141974358
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectroscopic determination of leaf morphological and biochemical traits for northern temperate and boreal tree species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/13-2110.1
- The paper
- Serbin, S. P., Singh, A., McNeil, B. E., Kingdon, C. C., & Townsend, P. A. (2014). Spectroscopic determination of leaf morphological and biochemical traits for northern temperate and boreal tree species. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2110.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.