Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition predicts local grassland primary production worldwide

Open access
Stevens, Carly J., Lind, Eric M., Hautier, Yann, Harpole, W. Stanley, Borer, Elizabeth T., Hobbie, Sarah, Seabloom, Eric W., Ladwig, Laura, Bakker, Jonathan D., Chu, Chengjin, Collins, Scott, Davies, Kendi F., Firn, Jennifer, Hillebrand, Helmut, Pierre, Kimberly J. La, MacDougall, Andrew, Melbourne, Brett, McCulley, Rebecca L., Morgan, John, Orrock, John L., Prober, Suzanne M., Risch, Anita C., Schuetz, Martin, Wragg, Peter D.·2015·Ecology

Abstract

Humans dominate many important Earth system processes including the nitrogen (N) cycle. Atmospheric N deposition affects fundamental processes such as carbon cycling, climate regulation, and biodiversity, and could result in changes to fundamental Earth system processes such as primary production. Both modelling and experimentation have suggested a role for anthropogenically altered N deposition in increasing productivity, nevertheless, current understanding of the relative strength of N deposition with respect to other controls on production such as edaphic conditions and climate is limited. Here we use an international multiscale data set to show that atmospheric N deposition is positively correlated to aboveground net primary production (ANPP) observed at the 1‐m 2 level across a wide range of herbaceous ecosystems. N deposition was a better predictor than climatic drivers and local soil conditions, explaining 16% of observed variation in ANPP globally with an increase of 1 kg N·ha−1·yr−1 increasing ANPP by 3%. Soil pH explained 8% of observed variation in ANPP while climatic drivers showed no significant relationship. Our results illustrate that the incorporation of global N deposition patterns in Earth system models are likely to substantially improve estimates of primary production in herbaceous systems. In herbaceous systems across the world, humans appear to be partially driving local ANPP through impacts on the N cycle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/14-1902.1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Stevens, C. J., Lind, E. M., Hautier, Y., Harpole, W. S., Borer, E. T., Hobbie, S., Seabloom, E. W., Ladwig, L., Bakker, J. D., Chu, C., Collins, S., Davies, K. F., Firn, J., Hillebrand, H., Pierre, K. J. L., MacDougall, A., Melbourne, B., McCulley, R. L., Morgan, J., Orrock, J. L., Prober, S. M., Risch, A. C., Schuetz, M., & Wragg, P. D.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06
Volume
96
Issue
6
Pages
1459-1465
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W1198883087
Cited by
211
References
5
FWCI
17.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition predicts local grassland primary production worldwide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/14-1902.1
The paper
Stevens, C. J., Lind, E. M., Hautier, Y., Harpole, W. S., Borer, E. T., Hobbie, S., Seabloom, E. W., Ladwig, L., Bakker, J. D., Chu, C., Collins, S., Davies, K. F., Firn, J., Hillebrand, H., Pierre, K. J. L., MacDougall, A., Melbourne, B., McCulley, R. L., Morgan, J., . . . Wragg, P. D. (2015). Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition predicts local grassland primary production worldwide. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1902.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.