The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties
Abstract
A major goal of remote sensing is the development of generalizable algorithms to repeatedly and accurately map ecosystem properties across space and time. Imaging spectroscopy has great potential to map vegetation traits that cannot be retrieved from broadband spectral data, but rarely have such methods been tested across broad regions. Here we illustrate a general approach for estimating key foliar chemical and morphological traits through space and time using NASA's Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS‐Classic). We apply partial least squares regression (PLSR) to data from 237 field plots within 51 images acquired between 2008 and 2011. Using a series of 500 randomized 50/50 subsets of the original data, we generated spatially explicit maps of seven traits (leaf mass per area (Marea), percentage nitrogen, carbon, fiber, lignin, and cellulose, and isotopic nitrogen concentration, δ 15 N) as well as pixel‐wise uncertainties in their estimates based on error propagation in the analytical methods. Both Marea and %N PLSR models had a R2> 0.85. Root mean square errors (RMSEs) for both variables were less than 9% of the range of data. Fiber and lignin were predicted with R2> 0.65 and carbon and cellulose with R2> 0.45. Although R2 of %C and cellulose were lower than Marea and %N, the measured variability of these constituents (especially %C) was also lower, and their RMSE values were beneath 12% of the range in overall variability. Model performance for δ 15 N was the lowest (R2= 0.48, RMSE = 0.95‰), but within 15% of the observed range. The resulting maps of chemical and morphological traits, together with their overall uncertainties, represent a first‐of‐its‐kind approach for examining the spatiotemporal patterns of forest functioning and nutrient cycling across a broad range of temperate and sub‐boreal ecosystems. These results offer an alternative to categorical maps of functional or physiognomic types by providing non‐discrete maps (i.e., on a continuum) of traits that define those functional types. A key contribution of this work is the ability to assign retrieval uncertainties by pixel, a requirement to enable assimilation of these data products into ecosystem modeling frameworks to constrain carbon and nutrient cycling projections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial
Geladi, P., & Kowalski, B. R. (1986) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-9 · Cited by 6,992
Sims, D. A., & Gamon, J. A. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00010-x · Cited by 3,476
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D., & Muratore, J. F. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936780 · Cited by 2,641
Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Falster, D. S., Garnier, E., Hikosaka, K., Lamont, B. B., Lee, W., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., et al. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x · Cited by 2,598
Wold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H., & Dunn, III (1984) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0905052 · Cited by 2,529
From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., & Ellsworth, D. S. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.25.13730 · Cited by 2,423
AINSWORTH, E. A., & ROGERS, A. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x · Cited by 2,303
Cited by
Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities
Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Christoffersen, B. O., Dietze, M. C., Farrior, C. E., Holm, J. A., Hurtt, G. C., Knox, R. G., Lawrence, P. J., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13910 · Cited by 768
Self-citationRepresentativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites
Chu, H., Luo, X., Ouyang, Z., Chan, W. S., Dengel, S., Biraud, S. C., Torn, M. S., Metzger, S., Kumar, J., Arain, M. A., et al. (2021) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108350 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, A., Serbin, S. P., McNeil, B. E., Kingdon, C. C., & Townsend, P. A.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2180-2197
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W1683383071
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 122
- FWCI
- 12.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/14-2098.1
- The paper
- Singh, A., Serbin, S. P., McNeil, B. E., Kingdon, C. C., & Townsend, P. A. (2015). Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2098.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.