Effect of habitat complexity attributes on species richness
Open accessAbstract
Habitat destruction is a leading cause of biodiversity loss worldwide. Destruction involving structural simplification tends to be a large contributing factor to this loss as many studies have reported a positive relationship between habitat complexity and taxonomic richness. However, the aspects of complexity that are most important for this relationship are still unclear. We tested whether several attributes of complexity contribute significantly to the effects of habitat complexity on macroinvertebrate richness. We sampled macroinvertebrates associated with several species of macrophytes covering a wide complexity gradient in freshwater coastal wetlands. Macrophyte complexity was quantified by measuring vertical and horizontal interstitial distances. Multiple regression was used to assess the relative importance of complexity attributes including the overall complexity as a space size/frequency index, space‐size heterogeneity as the variation in space sizes, as well as the more commonly used macrophyte biomass, number of stems and the number of macrophyte species. Our results indicate that space‐size heterogeneity is a more important contributor to taxonomic richness than overall complexity and the other complexity attributes examined. The results of this study have implications for the use of this concept in habitat restoration by the enhancement of habitat structures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increasing complexity of both pelagic and littoral habitat results in an ecosystem that may be more resilient to environmental stress.
“The increasing complexity of both pelagic and littoral habitat results in an ecosystem that may be more resilient to environmental stress (Naiman and Latterell 2005, St. Pierre and Kovalenko 2014).”
From Assessment of the Onondaga Lake, New York, fish community following reductions of nutrient inputs from a wastewater treatment plant (2015) · cites this paper as St. Pierre and Kovalenko 2014
Cites
Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P. J., Hooten, A. J., Steneck, R. S., Greenfield, P., Gomez, E., Harvell, C. D., Sale, P. F., Edwards, A. J., Caldeira, K., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152509 · Cited by 5,885 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murphy, M. H., Gandino, C. J., Ringler, N. H., Kirby, L., Johnson, S., Smith, M., & Schroeder, S. (2015) · Lake and Reservoir Management · doi:10.1080/10402381.2015.1093569 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- St. Pierre, J. I., & Kovalenko, K. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
- ORCID
- Kovalenko, Katya E.
- Venue
- Ecosphere
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 2150-8925 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037979929
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecosphere (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Center for Atmospheric Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- habitat complexity, species richness, macroinvertebrates, aquatic plants, habitat loss, habitat restoration, structural simplification, biodiversity loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review