Relationships for estimating N 2 fixation in legumes: incidence for N balance of legume‐based cropping systems in Europe
Open accessAbstract
Management of nitrogen (N) inputs into agricultural systems is of increasing interest due to the intensive use of synthetic fertilizers in modern cash crop systems, which has caused considerable environmental damage, including nitrate contamination of surface and groundwater, eutrophication of coastal marine areas and emission of greenhouse gases. The use of legumes grown in rotations or intercropping is nowadays regarded as an alternative and sustainable way of introducing N into low‐input cropping systems. In order to develop a simple tool to assess biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) by legume pulse and forages within crop rotations, we conducted a systematic literature survey with a quantitative statistical analysis intended to define a robust relationship between measurable variables and N 2 fixation. We found highly significant correlations between total N accumulation in shoot matter and fixed N 2 in forage ( y = 0.79 x − 0.49) and grain ( y = 0.70 x + 1.01) legumes. Accurately estimating the contribution of belowground components is more difficult because of a lack of relevant studies. Properly assessing BNF is crucial to evaluate the possibility of diversified legume based cropping systems achieving a balance between inputs and outputs, thus ensuring both short‐term productivity and long‐term sustainability. For a typical nine‐year organic rotation in the Paris basin alternating legumes and cereals, the soil surface balance, calculated with the relationships obtained, indicated that N fluxes were balanced, leaving a surplus of only a few kg N/ha/yr, with legumes accounting for 86% of total N inputs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Botanical composition, N2 fixation capacity, and fertilizer management affect the amount and form (mineral and organic N) of soil nitrogen in leys.
“Both the botanical composition and N 2 fixation capacity, as well as the fertilizer management affect the amount and form (mineral and organic N) of soil N in leys (Anglade et al. 2015;Carlsson and Huss-Danell 2003;Thers et al. 2022).”
From Cover crops and optimal N management reduce nitrate leaching to background levels in grass-clover–barley rotations on sandy soil (2026) · cites this paper as Anglade et al. 2015
Cites
Camargo, J. A., & Alonso, Á. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,248 · see citing works
Cheng, W. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.04.018 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lassaletta, L., Billen, G., Grizzetti, B., Anglade, J., & Garnier, J. (2014) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105011 · Cited by 1,219 · see citing works
Self-citationBillen, G., Aguilera, E., Einarsson, R., Garnier, J., Gingrich, S., Grizzetti, B., Lassaletta, L., Le Noë, J., & Sanz-Cobena, A. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.008 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationDeclining spatial efficiency of global cropland nitrogen allocation
Mueller, N. D., Lassaletta, L., Runck, B. C., Billen, G., Garnier, J., & Gerber, J. S. (2017) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/2016gb005515 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationCrops, Nitrogen, Water: Are Legumes Friend, Foe, or Misunderstood Ally?
Adams, M. A., Buchmann, N., Sprent, J., Buckley, T. N., & Turnbull, T. L. (2018) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.009 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Eriksen, J., Jensen, J. L., Larsen, S. U., Thers, H., & Vogeler, I. (2026) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-026-10479-z
“Both the botanical composition and N 2 fixation capacity, as well as the fertilizer management affect the amount and form (mineral and organic N) of soil N in leys (Anglade et al. 2015; Carlsson and Huss-Danell 2003; Thers et al. 2022).”
- Authors
- Anglade, J., Billen, G., & Garnier, J.
- Affiliations
- Milieux environnementaux, transferts et interactions dans les hydrosystèmes et les sols (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Anglade, Juliette
- Venue
- Ecosphere
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 2150-8925 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005067119
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 44.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecosphere (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Keywords
- nitrogen fixation, Fabaceae, nitrogen balance, crop rotation, forage legumes, pulses, nitrogen accumulation, organic farming, nitrogen inputs, nitrogen fluxes, legume-cereal rotation, Paris Basin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review