The Development of a Measure of Psychological Maltreatment of Women by Their Male Partners
Abstract
This study describes the initial development of a scale of measurement of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. The initial version of the scale was administered to 407 men and 207 women at intake into a domestic violence program. All 58 items of the scale were endorsed by a large enough number of subjects to warrant inclusion in the final instrument. Factor analysis revealed a similar factor structure for the men and women, with dominance-isolation and emotional-verbal abuse factors emerging from the analysis. Intracouple reliability for each item of the scale was examined for the subset of men and women who were cohabiting couples (n = 28). Unsurprisingly, the agreement of men's and women's reports was low, though the scores on the domination-isolation subscale were significantly correlated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The domination/isolation subscale of the PMWI-DI or its short form was the most frequently used coercive control measure (n = 17).
“The domination/isolation subscale of the PMWI-DI (Tolman, 1989) or its short form (PMWI-SF-DI; Tolman, 1999) were most frequently used (n = 17).”
From The Trauma and Mental Health Impacts of Coercive Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Tolman, 1989
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 689
- Authors
- Tolman, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tolman, Richard M.
- ORCID
- Tolman, Richard M.
- Venue
- Violence and Victims
- Publisher
- Springer Publishing Company
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-177
- ISSN
- 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7073
- OpenAlex
- W1910004000
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5t32mh017152-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32-MH17152)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Keywords
- psychological maltreatment, intimate partner violence, male perpetrators, women, scale development, emotional abuse, verbal abuse, cohabiting couples
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Tests, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Spouse Abuse, Violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review