Cited by 99Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Psychometric Properties of the Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CBQ) Among Mexican Adolescents

Gámez-Guadix, Manuel, Villa-George, Fabiola, Calvete, Esther·2014·Violence and Victims

Abstract

The first objective of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CBQ), an instrument for measuring the perpetration and victimization of bullying via new technologies for adolescents. The second objective was to analyze gender differences in the prevalence of cyberbullying. The study sample consisted of 1,491 Mexican adolescents (52.4% male and 47.6% female) with a mean age of 14.51 years (SD = 1.57, range = 12-18). A confirmatory factor analysis of the CBQ indicated a good fit of a model consisting of two factors designated as "perpetration" and "victimization." The internal consistencies for these subscales were adequate. Furthermore, multiple-group-covariance-structure analysis with the Mexican and a Spanish sample (N = 1008; 55.7% girls; mean age = 15.23 years, SD = 1.4) indicated equivalence of the factor structure of the CBQ across samples. An analysis of the relationship between the CBQ and other variables-such as the justification of cyberbullying, impulsivity, and depression-provided additional data supporting the construct validity of the instrument. Regarding gender differences in the prevalence of CB, perpetration was significantly higher for males than for females, whereas no differences were found for victimization. Finally, we discuss the contributions of this work to the field of study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00163r1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 99

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Byrne B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Hills Dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Metadata

Authors
Gámez-Guadix, M., Villa-George, F., & Calvete, E.
Affiliations
Universidad de Deusto (ES)
Venue
Violence and Victims
Published
2014
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
232-247
ISSN
  • 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7073
OpenAlex
W2018576171
Cited by
99
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyberbullying perpetration, cyber victimization, adolescents, psychometric properties, factor structure, cross-cultural equivalence, gender differences, impulsivity, depression, Mexican adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Mexico, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Spain, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review