Cited by 96Cancer survivorship and careAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Tailoring cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat anxiety comorbid with advanced cancer

Open access
Greer, Joseph A., Park, Elyse R., Prigerson, Holly G., Safren, Steven A.·2010·Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Patients with advanced cancer often experience debilitating anxiety symptoms that interfere with quality of life and relate to worse medical outcomes. Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an empirically-validated, first-line treatment for anxiety disorders, clinical trials of CBT for anxiety typically exclude patients with medical comorbidities in general, and those with terminal illnesses, such as advanced cancer, in particular. Moreover, CBT has generally targeted unrealistic fears and worries in otherwise healthy individuals with clinically significant anxiety symptoms. Consequently, traditional CBT does not sufficiently address the cognitive components of anxiety in patients with cancer, especially negative thought patterns that are rational but nonetheless intrusive and distressing, such as concerns about pain, disability and death, as well as management of multiple stressors, changes in functional status and burdensome medical treatments. In this paper, we describe a treatment approach for tailoring CBT to the needs of this population. Three case examples of patients diagnosed with terminal lung cancer are presented to demonstrate the treatment methods along with outcome measures for anxiety and quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0889-8391.24.4.294

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior reviews identified that face-to-face CBT provided some benefit in decreasing depressive and anxiety symptoms in advanced cancer.

    “First, prior reviews identified that face-to-face CBT (individual (Moorey et al., 2009, Anderson et al., 2008) and group (Edelman et al., 1999)) provided some benefit in assisting those living with advanced cancer by decreasing depressive and anxiety symptoms (Greer et al., 2010; Moorey et al., 2009; Horne and Watson, 2011).”

    From A mixed methods pilot and feasibility open trial of internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (iCanADAPT Advanced) for people with advanced cancer with depression and/or anxiety (2021) · cites this paper as Greer et al., 2010

    The Introduction’s ‘Psychosocial Interventions for Anxiety Comorbid with Cancer’ section reports benefits for anxiety or distress in broader cancer populations. But it says a systematic review found no consistent evidence for CBT’s efficacy against anxiety in cancer, and only 15% of reviewed studies included people with advanced disease. It does not establish that face-to-face CBT decreased both depressive and anxiety symptoms in advanced cancer. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Attempts at cognitive restructuring would be inappropriate for patients with advanced disease and/or those approaching the end of life, given that their intrusive thoughts and ruminations are realistic and inevitable.

    “Accordingly, attempts at cognitive restructuring would be inappropriate for patients with advanced disease and/or those approaching the end of life, given that their intrusive thoughts and ruminations are realistic and inevitable [52].”

    From Psychological and Psychiatric Comorbidities in Youth with Serious Physical Illness (2022) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Introduction says cognitive restructuring may be inadequate or inappropriate for realistic cancer fears, particularly in advanced disease or with shortened life expectancy. But Module 3 says it remains valid for worries involving cognitive errors, and the case examples show it being used; the source does not say all intrusive thoughts are realistic and inevitable or that restructuring is categorically inappropriate for these patients. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 96

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Baer R 2003 Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 10 2 125 143
  2. Barlow D 2008 Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual 4 New York, NY The Guilford Press
  3. Barlow D 2002 Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic 2 New York, NY The Guilford Press
  4. Beck J 1995 Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond New York Guilford Press
  5. Craske M Antony M Barlow D 2006 Mastering your fears and phobias: Therapist guide 2 New York Oxford University Press
  6. Craske M Barlow D 2006 Mastery of your anxiety and worry: Workbook 2 New York Oxford University Press
  7. D’Zurilla TJ 1986 Problem solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical interventions New York Springer
  8. Greer JA Graham JS Safren SA Otto M Hofmann S 2009 Resolving treatment complications associated with comorbid medical conditions Avoiding treatment failures in the anxiety disorders New York Springer
  9. Moorey S Greer S 2002 Cognitive-behavioral therapy for people with cancer New York Oxford University Press
  10. National Institute of Mental Health 1995 CGI (Clinical Global Impression) scale Psychopharmacology Bulletin 21 839 843
  11. Schultz JH Luthe W 1969 Autogenic therapy (Vol. 1): Autogenic methods New York and London Grune and Stratton
  12. Taylor RR 2006 Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic illness and disability New York Springer
  13. Turk D Gatchel R 2002 Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner’s handbook 2 New York, NY The Guilford Press

Authors
Greer, J. A., Park, E. R., Prigerson, H. G., & Safren, S. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2010-11
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
294-313
ISSN
  • 0889-8391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-887X
OpenAlex
W1985938816
Cited by
96
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • National Cancer Institute (R03CA128478)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety, advanced cancer, terminal illness, treatment adaptation, terminal lung cancer, quality of life, death concerns, stressors, case examples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review